Saturday, June 4, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Week 12: Post your Blog Entries as Comments to my Main Post Each Week
Post by Sunday at midnight.
[1]
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Trends of U.S. inequality and marriage bodes poorly for U.S. quality of life
3. There are some cultural reproduction issues in the USA that could pull the USA apart: massive social reproduction of inequality and poverty for children; many children without the social, emotional, and financial stability of two parents in the USA; and ethnic inequalities tensions with different marriage rates; and women particularly without financial standing outside of marriage, despite gaining independence. Just a few of the trends of the USA that bode poorly I think.
---------------
05-22-2011 15:03
Schwarzenegger just part of story of marriage woes
By Jay Ambrose
...It's now Arnold Schwarzenegger's media moment, something he earned by extra friendliness with household help, having a love child and finally telling Maria Shriver, his wife, about it. She has naturally enough separated from him, and some may think this one more message about an institution in deep trouble, though it is far from the heart of that story.
No, the Schwarzenegger tale mostly symbolizes how ambitious, driven, ego-centered men seem especially given to wandering off the ranch, the examples running the political gamut from John F. Kennedy in the 1960s to Newt Gingrich more recently.
These particular men, however, are upper middle class ― well, upper, upper, upper middle class. It's mostly poorer Americans with scant education who are most abandoning marriage, often not even giving it a whirl, as you can learn from Kay S. Hymowitz, a Manhattan Institute scholar and author of several books and some online writings I recently encountered.
She's full of reason, understanding and facts, and tells us among other things that all the news gab about the marital mayhem of celebrities can be very misleading.
Most educated, better-off folks are in fact growing more in love with marriage. When you catch a story such as a recent one saying three percent more married-couple families are celebrating 10th wedding anniversaries than in the 1980s, you can bet it's the most advantaged taking more advantage of this absolutely crucial institution.
Go back to the 1960s, and we were a marrying, stay-together nation. But then came the birth control pill, something called the sexual revolution and more widely respected rights and opportunities for women. Says Hymowitz, all of this caused many women to reevaluate the old idea that first comes love, marriage, then the baby carriage.
Divorce became a big deal with us, and still is, despite some decline over the past two decades. Very, very scary on top of that is that something more than a third of children are now born out of wedlock, if only a tiny percentage of them to college educated women. They've figured something important out. Marriage matters to children.
They get it that kids with two parents earning money are going to have more money coming in. They get it that having two married-couple parents means more training for the children, more guidance by example toward the kind of life that works best for families, more attention to academics. Those who don't get it are people with the least education ― often less than high school. Here is what single-parent homes give us on average: still no education to speak of in the next generation, still more poverty, still more single-parent moms.
Hymowitz skillfully takes on the people who argue differently, saying that it's the market economy or inadequate social programs that cause these difficulties or that poor women don't marry because there is no one out there for them, no acceptable male. She grants the market is increasingly less friendly to unskilled labor, but notes that marriage tends to engender education and skills in children.
She observes, too, that the women who don't marry often have live-in boyfriends. They have in fact located men they find suitable to have in the home. Hymowitz agrees that marriage may not be a panacea for poverty, but argues something bigger: It is the "sine qua non," that without which you get none of the rest of what it takes to climb out of it.
The percentages of unwed mothers among poor whites, blacks and some other minority groups are over half, and if we are going to fix what ails us, we have to fix this. I am dubious about the role of politics, though some good examples and good preaching might help.
I do believe that cultural values count, as opposed to the politically correct social scientists, some of whom were saying in one news account that talking about wrong values amounts to blaming the victims. No, it's blaming the culture, including the social scientists who help form it. We need a new revolution, and wise thinkers like Hymowitz can help us get there.
---
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/05/160_87418.html
[2]
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Quality of Life Editorial in Korea Times--Mentions Our Course Content!
3. I feel somewhat vindicated to see someone else in Korea discussing the exact same issues I have chosen for my course. Interesting that this person has MET many of the people we are discussing as well.
------------------------
05-26-2011 17:28
Measuring happiness
By Shin Hyun-gook
Throughout history, all around the globe, humankind has been on a quest. A quest whose completion is as elusive as the Loch Ness monster, yet as easy to attain as looking in the mirror, that quest being the pursuit of happiness. American novelist, Nathaniel Hawthorne, said, ``Happiness is a butterfly, which, when pursued, is always just beyond your grasp, but which, if you will sit down quietly, may alight upon you."
What is happiness? The term happiness is abstract and means many different things to many different people. According to Miriam-Webster, happiness is ``a state of well-being and contentment." That emotional state the dictionary refers to is arguably different for everyone. Quotes from many saints, religious leaders and philosophers lead us to deal with the idea of happiness in more emotional terms.
But, there are organizations trying to measure happiness by indexing the quality of life. The United Nations annually releases [one version of this idea of Quality of Life, measured in its own way:] what is called the Human Development Index. This statistic ranks countries by their level of development, calculated from data on life expectancy, education and per-capita gross national income. For instance, The 2010 Human Development Report by UNDP lists the Republic of Korea 12th in the category of very highly developed countries.
The same report however, ranks Korea 27th by applying, for the first time, an inequality-adjusted Human Development Index, which factors in inequalities [discussed by Navarro and others] in the three basic categories of human development: income, life expectancy and education. Former U.S. Senator Robert Kennedy said ``GDP measured everything except that which makes life worthwhile." Discrepancies such as this lead to the study and development of other indexes and methods of “measuring happiness.”
For the last two years I have been hosting a weekly television program, ``Diplomacy Lounge” on Arirang Television. On this program I have been meeting with foreign ambassadors and international dignitaries to discuss their country's history, culture, society, economy, scientific development as well as other subject matters in order to provide an arena for exchange and communication.
In two recent interviews, one with the visiting Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Bhutan, His Excellency Lyonchhehn Jigmi Y Thinley on October 26, 2010 and the other with Ambassador Fernando Borbón Arias of Costa Rica to Korea on April 13, 2011, the topic of ``happiness” was discussed.
The prime minister of the Kingdom of Bhutan claimed that Bhutan is one of the happiest nations on Earth and is one of the original promoters of ``Gross National Happiness.” The term was coined in 1972 by Bhutan's former King Jigme Singye Wangchuck. This index measures the usefulness and the rightfulness of a nation's production. Sub-categories are under consideration for this index such as: psychological health, physical health, time management, education, culture, good governance, ecology etc.
And in my interview with the Ambassador of Costa Rica to Korea, Mr. Fernando Borbón Arias, I learned that Costa Rica ranked number one on the 2009 Happy Planet Index. After my discussion with Bhutan’s Prime Minister, this was yet another surprise. I found that the Happy Planet Index was introduced by the New Economics Foundation in 2006, indexing average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and the ecological footprint per capita of each nation. Scholars calculated happiness by determining ``happy life years.” This figure results from merging average self-reported happiness with life expectancy [and divided by material consumption averages in the country, for a measure of 'material efficiency in creating subjective happiness']. The Republic of Korea was listed 68th.
Therefore, it is apparent that things like money and education do not affect happiness the way one might expect. [Easterlin and the ongoing debate with him] There are various factors that have been correlated with happiness. Gross domestic product and the Human Development Index are not taken into account. Being happy and healthy is regarded as the ultimate goal of most people. But without proper income and social infrastructure how can you reach that ultimate goal? Moreover, concepts related to happiness, quality of life and well-being are somewhat subjective. U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron said, ``You cannot capture happiness on a spreadsheet any more than you can bottle it,” which leads some to think there is potential for governments to define GNH in a way that suits their own interests. Therefore, cross-cultural comparisons of happiness are sometimes controversial.
These controversies and discrepancies guide me to the teachings of saints and philosophers. ``The Art of Happiness” a book by the Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler, a psychiatrist who posed questions to the Dalai Lama, stated that “Happiness is determined more by the [subjective] state of one’s mind than by one’s external conditions, circumstances, or events ― at least once one’s basic survival needs are met.” [With 97% of Bhutan subjectively happy, this is worth considering, though there is data as well showing that happiness is correlated with objective measures as well, up to a basic material satisfaction point and without going beyond that (i.e., more material fails to equal more happiness).] Prior to this statement, Bengali Ramakrishna Paramhansa had asked, ``What do a house, money and honor mean to you if you are not happy? If you think you are already happy what do those things mean to you?”
So, what really is happiness and are you happy? Only you know the answers.
The writer is a chair professor of the Catholic University of Daegu and a show host of Arirang TV. He headed the Foreign News Division of the Korea Overseas Information Service. He can be reached at shinhyungook@hotmail.com.
---
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/05/137_87732.html
[1]
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Trends of U.S. inequality and marriage bodes poorly for U.S. quality of life
3. There are some cultural reproduction issues in the USA that could pull the USA apart: massive social reproduction of inequality and poverty for children; many children without the social, emotional, and financial stability of two parents in the USA; and ethnic inequalities tensions with different marriage rates; and women particularly without financial standing outside of marriage, despite gaining independence. Just a few of the trends of the USA that bode poorly I think.
---------------
05-22-2011 15:03
Schwarzenegger just part of story of marriage woes
By Jay Ambrose
...It's now Arnold Schwarzenegger's media moment, something he earned by extra friendliness with household help, having a love child and finally telling Maria Shriver, his wife, about it. She has naturally enough separated from him, and some may think this one more message about an institution in deep trouble, though it is far from the heart of that story.
No, the Schwarzenegger tale mostly symbolizes how ambitious, driven, ego-centered men seem especially given to wandering off the ranch, the examples running the political gamut from John F. Kennedy in the 1960s to Newt Gingrich more recently.
These particular men, however, are upper middle class ― well, upper, upper, upper middle class. It's mostly poorer Americans with scant education who are most abandoning marriage, often not even giving it a whirl, as you can learn from Kay S. Hymowitz, a Manhattan Institute scholar and author of several books and some online writings I recently encountered.
She's full of reason, understanding and facts, and tells us among other things that all the news gab about the marital mayhem of celebrities can be very misleading.
Most educated, better-off folks are in fact growing more in love with marriage. When you catch a story such as a recent one saying three percent more married-couple families are celebrating 10th wedding anniversaries than in the 1980s, you can bet it's the most advantaged taking more advantage of this absolutely crucial institution.
Go back to the 1960s, and we were a marrying, stay-together nation. But then came the birth control pill, something called the sexual revolution and more widely respected rights and opportunities for women. Says Hymowitz, all of this caused many women to reevaluate the old idea that first comes love, marriage, then the baby carriage.
Divorce became a big deal with us, and still is, despite some decline over the past two decades. Very, very scary on top of that is that something more than a third of children are now born out of wedlock, if only a tiny percentage of them to college educated women. They've figured something important out. Marriage matters to children.
They get it that kids with two parents earning money are going to have more money coming in. They get it that having two married-couple parents means more training for the children, more guidance by example toward the kind of life that works best for families, more attention to academics. Those who don't get it are people with the least education ― often less than high school. Here is what single-parent homes give us on average: still no education to speak of in the next generation, still more poverty, still more single-parent moms.
Hymowitz skillfully takes on the people who argue differently, saying that it's the market economy or inadequate social programs that cause these difficulties or that poor women don't marry because there is no one out there for them, no acceptable male. She grants the market is increasingly less friendly to unskilled labor, but notes that marriage tends to engender education and skills in children.
She observes, too, that the women who don't marry often have live-in boyfriends. They have in fact located men they find suitable to have in the home. Hymowitz agrees that marriage may not be a panacea for poverty, but argues something bigger: It is the "sine qua non," that without which you get none of the rest of what it takes to climb out of it.
The percentages of unwed mothers among poor whites, blacks and some other minority groups are over half, and if we are going to fix what ails us, we have to fix this. I am dubious about the role of politics, though some good examples and good preaching might help.
I do believe that cultural values count, as opposed to the politically correct social scientists, some of whom were saying in one news account that talking about wrong values amounts to blaming the victims. No, it's blaming the culture, including the social scientists who help form it. We need a new revolution, and wise thinkers like Hymowitz can help us get there.
---
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/05/160_87418.html
[2]
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Quality of Life Editorial in Korea Times--Mentions Our Course Content!
3. I feel somewhat vindicated to see someone else in Korea discussing the exact same issues I have chosen for my course. Interesting that this person has MET many of the people we are discussing as well.
------------------------
05-26-2011 17:28
Measuring happiness
By Shin Hyun-gook
Throughout history, all around the globe, humankind has been on a quest. A quest whose completion is as elusive as the Loch Ness monster, yet as easy to attain as looking in the mirror, that quest being the pursuit of happiness. American novelist, Nathaniel Hawthorne, said, ``Happiness is a butterfly, which, when pursued, is always just beyond your grasp, but which, if you will sit down quietly, may alight upon you."
What is happiness? The term happiness is abstract and means many different things to many different people. According to Miriam-Webster, happiness is ``a state of well-being and contentment." That emotional state the dictionary refers to is arguably different for everyone. Quotes from many saints, religious leaders and philosophers lead us to deal with the idea of happiness in more emotional terms.
But, there are organizations trying to measure happiness by indexing the quality of life. The United Nations annually releases [one version of this idea of Quality of Life, measured in its own way:] what is called the Human Development Index. This statistic ranks countries by their level of development, calculated from data on life expectancy, education and per-capita gross national income. For instance, The 2010 Human Development Report by UNDP lists the Republic of Korea 12th in the category of very highly developed countries.
The same report however, ranks Korea 27th by applying, for the first time, an inequality-adjusted Human Development Index, which factors in inequalities [discussed by Navarro and others] in the three basic categories of human development: income, life expectancy and education. Former U.S. Senator Robert Kennedy said ``GDP measured everything except that which makes life worthwhile." Discrepancies such as this lead to the study and development of other indexes and methods of “measuring happiness.”
For the last two years I have been hosting a weekly television program, ``Diplomacy Lounge” on Arirang Television. On this program I have been meeting with foreign ambassadors and international dignitaries to discuss their country's history, culture, society, economy, scientific development as well as other subject matters in order to provide an arena for exchange and communication.
In two recent interviews, one with the visiting Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Bhutan, His Excellency Lyonchhehn Jigmi Y Thinley on October 26, 2010 and the other with Ambassador Fernando Borbón Arias of Costa Rica to Korea on April 13, 2011, the topic of ``happiness” was discussed.
The prime minister of the Kingdom of Bhutan claimed that Bhutan is one of the happiest nations on Earth and is one of the original promoters of ``Gross National Happiness.” The term was coined in 1972 by Bhutan's former King Jigme Singye Wangchuck. This index measures the usefulness and the rightfulness of a nation's production. Sub-categories are under consideration for this index such as: psychological health, physical health, time management, education, culture, good governance, ecology etc.
And in my interview with the Ambassador of Costa Rica to Korea, Mr. Fernando Borbón Arias, I learned that Costa Rica ranked number one on the 2009 Happy Planet Index. After my discussion with Bhutan’s Prime Minister, this was yet another surprise. I found that the Happy Planet Index was introduced by the New Economics Foundation in 2006, indexing average subjective life satisfaction, life expectancy at birth, and the ecological footprint per capita of each nation. Scholars calculated happiness by determining ``happy life years.” This figure results from merging average self-reported happiness with life expectancy [and divided by material consumption averages in the country, for a measure of 'material efficiency in creating subjective happiness']. The Republic of Korea was listed 68th.
Therefore, it is apparent that things like money and education do not affect happiness the way one might expect. [Easterlin and the ongoing debate with him] There are various factors that have been correlated with happiness. Gross domestic product and the Human Development Index are not taken into account. Being happy and healthy is regarded as the ultimate goal of most people. But without proper income and social infrastructure how can you reach that ultimate goal? Moreover, concepts related to happiness, quality of life and well-being are somewhat subjective. U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron said, ``You cannot capture happiness on a spreadsheet any more than you can bottle it,” which leads some to think there is potential for governments to define GNH in a way that suits their own interests. Therefore, cross-cultural comparisons of happiness are sometimes controversial.
These controversies and discrepancies guide me to the teachings of saints and philosophers. ``The Art of Happiness” a book by the Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler, a psychiatrist who posed questions to the Dalai Lama, stated that “Happiness is determined more by the [subjective] state of one’s mind than by one’s external conditions, circumstances, or events ― at least once one’s basic survival needs are met.” [With 97% of Bhutan subjectively happy, this is worth considering, though there is data as well showing that happiness is correlated with objective measures as well, up to a basic material satisfaction point and without going beyond that (i.e., more material fails to equal more happiness).] Prior to this statement, Bengali Ramakrishna Paramhansa had asked, ``What do a house, money and honor mean to you if you are not happy? If you think you are already happy what do those things mean to you?”
So, what really is happiness and are you happy? Only you know the answers.
The writer is a chair professor of the Catholic University of Daegu and a show host of Arirang TV. He headed the Foreign News Division of the Korea Overseas Information Service. He can be reached at shinhyungook@hotmail.com.
---
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/05/137_87732.html
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Week 11: Post your Blog Entries as Comments to my Main Post Each Week
Post by Sunday at midnight.
Some films about quality of life--or lack thereof--in the "Bottom Billion." Films about the Central African Republic, Madagascar, and Bolivia follow.
Watch them and think about the four internal traps Collier mentions--and the fifth external trap, 'missing the boat'.
1. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
Guns in All Hands -Central African Republic
10:00 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htv0ydlBOgw
2a. MADAGASCAR
Crippled by Power - Madagascar
22:01 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8f1QU34yRo&feature=fvwrel
2b.
Diary of a Coup - Madagascar
25:40 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FLpxZt-m78
3a. BOLIVIA
Bolivian Blues
22:40 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbT75DRfayU&feature=relmfu
3b.
Coca or Death - Bolivia
26:50 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-B-fGT8l-Q
3c.
Two Bolivias - Bolivia
23:17 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NycGsSKgoY
3d.
Bolivia transfers land from rich to poor - 16 March 2008
2:55 min.
http://youtu.be/s9XjiqFMAGA
3e.
Bolivian Doctrine - Bolivia
5:18 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKX_m04fRCQ
Some films about quality of life--or lack thereof--in the "Bottom Billion." Films about the Central African Republic, Madagascar, and Bolivia follow.
Watch them and think about the four internal traps Collier mentions--and the fifth external trap, 'missing the boat'.
1. CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
Guns in All Hands -Central African Republic
10:00 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htv0ydlBOgw
"January 2009 - The Central African Republic has been wracked by violence for years. Now villagers, with the support of the government, are forming militias to defend themselves against the Zaraguinas and rebels."
2a. MADAGASCAR
Crippled by Power - Madagascar
22:01 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8f1QU34yRo&feature=fvwrel
"July 2002 - Self-made millionaire Ravalomanana [claimed to have] won elections last December on an anti-corruption ticket. But after two counts and two inaugurations he was recognised neither by his defeated opponent, nor, crucially, by ex-colonial power France. We chart the dispute as it descended into near civil-war, with ex-government employees dragged from their desks and bridges blown up by the retreating President. Trains stopped running, the port was blockaded, and food and petrol became scarce. Ratsiraka still calls it a "coup d'etat," but whilst he laid siege to the capital, children began dying of hunger. Care International says living standards have regressed by ten years. Even Western businesses have gone bust, like the Floreal clothes manufacturer, which employed tens of thousands of people. Now its factories stand empty. France finally recognised the new government this month, long after the damage has been done."
2b.
Diary of a Coup - Madagascar
25:40 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FLpxZt-m78
"April 2009 - [Now it is time for] President Ravalomanana [to be] scared. [Unlike how he was supported in 2002 [in his own coup and civil war],...[h]is people are protesting and former DJ Rajoelina has declared himself President. Yet with so much bloodshed and rioting can media shy Rajoelinas coup ever succeed?"
3a. BOLIVIA
Bolivian Blues
22:40 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbT75DRfayU&feature=relmfu
"February 2000 - Bolivia is at the heart of South America. It extends from the high Andes to tropical jungle. It's culturally, ethnically and geographically very diverse and potentially rich. Yet it ranks lowest of all South American countries in the UN's Human Development Index. Twenty per cent of children are undernourished. Average school attendance is less than seven years. Entrenched vested interests hamper foreign investment in the economy, while the landlocked geography of the country itself limits access to export markets. But there are signs of change. Annual inflation fell from a peak of 23,500 per cent in 1985 to less than 4.5 per cent by the close of 1998, and Bolivia's huge external debt burden has been substantially eased under new debt redemption programmes."
3b.
Coca or Death - Bolivia
26:50 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-B-fGT8l-Q
"10 October 2001 - Sandra Jordan delves into Bolivia -- a country torn apart by the demands of the West [and the world] for the coca plant."
3c.
Two Bolivias - Bolivia
23:17 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NycGsSKgoY
"August 2007 - Bolivia's [tiny] white elite claim they're tired of propping up the nation's economy [when they are only propping up themselves]. They're demanding political autonomy for their city [from the national distribution for the massive poverty in this country] and say they're ready to fight for it."
3d.
Bolivia transfers land from rich to poor - 16 March 2008
2:55 min.
http://youtu.be/s9XjiqFMAGA
Evo Morales, Bolivia's [first indigenous] present, has handed over thousands of hectares of land taken from large-scale owners to indigenous farmers and the country's ethnic Guarani Indians. Al Jazeera's Teresa Bo reports from southern Bolivia in Tarabuco where residents are celebrating their leader's generous acquisition.
3e.
Bolivian Doctrine - Bolivia
5:18 min.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKX_m04fRCQ
December 2009
Monday, May 9, 2011
Week 10: Post your Blog Entries as Comments to my Main Post Each Week
Post by Sunday at midnight.
1. Mark Whitaker
2. statistics on elderly pensions and elderly poverty in Korea
3. Since we're discussing the unique features of the "East Asian" welfare state this week and next..., here's something to think about: elderly suicide and its sociological contexts as caused by the Korean welfare state choices. The 'national pension' is nothing of the sort--it's for full time workers (similar to a corporatist model, instead of citizens), and this means it is hardly a universal system. It leaves many elderly in Korea poor and contemplating suicide. Certainly "Confucian ethics" (as Kim argued) are little applied in the Korean welfare state given the complete disregard for the elderly in the Korean system. Korea has the highest elderly suicide rate in the world by many times over, and its partially an issue of the welfare state organization.
-----------------
[Editorial] Older generation’s suicide epidemic
A very troubling incident occurred on Sunday during the Parents’ Day holiday. In the city of Yongin in Gyeonggi Province, a chronically ill husband and wife in their sixties hanged themselves, unable to bear being a burden to their children. They sent their son and his wife, who had been caring for them, off on a trip with their children, and they proceeded to take their own lives. It is heart wrenching to imagine the pain that couple must have felt, and the grief of the children who read the note they left saying, “Sorry and thank you.”
As South Korea rapidly proceeds toward a graying society, suicide among the elderly has gone well into the danger zone. According to figures released recently by the Hallym University Institute for Aging Studies, some 77 out of every 100 thousand South Koreans above the age of 65 or old took his or her life in 2009. The number has risen sharply, with an increase of more than fivefold in the twenty years since 1990, when it stood at 14.3. In 2007, Japan, which at one point earned the nickname “suicide kingdom,” had an elderly suicide rate of just 23.8 per 100 thousand people.
In spite of this, the issue has not received much attention in society [by the welfare state]. Instead, it has been written off as an issue of the individual’s psychological health, a family issue, or something along similar lines. The situation is that the very people who overcame suffering and achieved development over the turbulence of the Korean War, industrialization, and democratization are now ending their own solitary lives, abandoned to a blind spot in society.
On New Year’s Eve last year, a couple in their sixties took their lives after leaving a note that read, “We are leaving this world because we are not able to live anymore.” They had been scraping by on the money left over after paying 300 thousand won rent ($277) out of the 430 thousand won basic livelihood allowance they received each month.
Their suicide cannot be separate from a reality where, amid a failure by the social and health care systems to accept responsibility for diseases afflicting them, the majority of senior citizens do not have any income preservation system such as the National Pension. Last year, the poverty rate among South Korean senior citizens was among the world’s highest at 48.5 percent !!! ALMOST HALF ELDERLY IN POVERTY, in a 'developed' country, is a political and developmental CHOICE, instead of an accident], far in excess of the OECD average of 13.3 percent.
[And even if you get a pension, it a liberal style welfare state pushing you back into the market:] The basic old age pension received in 2010 by 3.73 million of the nation’s 5.5 million elderly amounted to just 90 thousand won a month for a single household.
The central and local governments need to step up their sense of alarm about senior citizen suicides and begin work on investigating the situation and developing prevention measures.
In addition, the public support system needs to be strengthened, for example by including among the recipients the more than one million people who are ineligible according to the National Basic Livelihood Security Act due to factors such as having children earning a certain income level. [So the elderly parents impoverish the family and the elderly feel guilty and kill themselves--due to the structure of the welfare state being based on family welfare means-tested criteria instead of individual welfare rights. The Korean system set up on private family based support mostly, and a small, unacceptable basis for those without it: a liberal welfare state idea, there]
Judging from the government’s plan for national finances, however, the percentage of the welfare budget out of gross domestic product is set to continue its decline from 7.5 percent in 2009 to 6.9 percent this year and 6.6 percent in 2014. As long as this continues, we will be unable to erase the shame of having the highest suicide rate among our senior citizens. [and the rate will only go higher by plan--by callous disregard.]
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/477164.html
1. Mark Whitaker
2. statistics on elderly pensions and elderly poverty in Korea
3. Since we're discussing the unique features of the "East Asian" welfare state this week and next..., here's something to think about: elderly suicide and its sociological contexts as caused by the Korean welfare state choices. The 'national pension' is nothing of the sort--it's for full time workers (similar to a corporatist model, instead of citizens), and this means it is hardly a universal system. It leaves many elderly in Korea poor and contemplating suicide. Certainly "Confucian ethics" (as Kim argued) are little applied in the Korean welfare state given the complete disregard for the elderly in the Korean system. Korea has the highest elderly suicide rate in the world by many times over, and its partially an issue of the welfare state organization.
-----------------
[Editorial] Older generation’s suicide epidemic
A very troubling incident occurred on Sunday during the Parents’ Day holiday. In the city of Yongin in Gyeonggi Province, a chronically ill husband and wife in their sixties hanged themselves, unable to bear being a burden to their children. They sent their son and his wife, who had been caring for them, off on a trip with their children, and they proceeded to take their own lives. It is heart wrenching to imagine the pain that couple must have felt, and the grief of the children who read the note they left saying, “Sorry and thank you.”
As South Korea rapidly proceeds toward a graying society, suicide among the elderly has gone well into the danger zone. According to figures released recently by the Hallym University Institute for Aging Studies, some 77 out of every 100 thousand South Koreans above the age of 65 or old took his or her life in 2009. The number has risen sharply, with an increase of more than fivefold in the twenty years since 1990, when it stood at 14.3. In 2007, Japan, which at one point earned the nickname “suicide kingdom,” had an elderly suicide rate of just 23.8 per 100 thousand people.
In spite of this, the issue has not received much attention in society [by the welfare state]. Instead, it has been written off as an issue of the individual’s psychological health, a family issue, or something along similar lines. The situation is that the very people who overcame suffering and achieved development over the turbulence of the Korean War, industrialization, and democratization are now ending their own solitary lives, abandoned to a blind spot in society.
On New Year’s Eve last year, a couple in their sixties took their lives after leaving a note that read, “We are leaving this world because we are not able to live anymore.” They had been scraping by on the money left over after paying 300 thousand won rent ($277) out of the 430 thousand won basic livelihood allowance they received each month.
Their suicide cannot be separate from a reality where, amid a failure by the social and health care systems to accept responsibility for diseases afflicting them, the majority of senior citizens do not have any income preservation system such as the National Pension. Last year, the poverty rate among South Korean senior citizens was among the world’s highest at 48.5 percent !!! ALMOST HALF ELDERLY IN POVERTY, in a 'developed' country, is a political and developmental CHOICE, instead of an accident], far in excess of the OECD average of 13.3 percent.
[And even if you get a pension, it a liberal style welfare state pushing you back into the market:] The basic old age pension received in 2010 by 3.73 million of the nation’s 5.5 million elderly amounted to just 90 thousand won a month for a single household.
The central and local governments need to step up their sense of alarm about senior citizen suicides and begin work on investigating the situation and developing prevention measures.
In addition, the public support system needs to be strengthened, for example by including among the recipients the more than one million people who are ineligible according to the National Basic Livelihood Security Act due to factors such as having children earning a certain income level. [So the elderly parents impoverish the family and the elderly feel guilty and kill themselves--due to the structure of the welfare state being based on family welfare means-tested criteria instead of individual welfare rights. The Korean system set up on private family based support mostly, and a small, unacceptable basis for those without it: a liberal welfare state idea, there]
Judging from the government’s plan for national finances, however, the percentage of the welfare budget out of gross domestic product is set to continue its decline from 7.5 percent in 2009 to 6.9 percent this year and 6.6 percent in 2014. As long as this continues, we will be unable to erase the shame of having the highest suicide rate among our senior citizens. [and the rate will only go higher by plan--by callous disregard.]
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/477164.html
Friday, May 6, 2011
Week 9: Post your Blog Entries as Comments to my Main Post Each Week
Post by Sunday at midnight.
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Study of Subjective Quality of Life/Happiness in 23 OECD Nations' Children: Korean Children lowest happiness, by a large margin
3. Korean youth that subjectively value money most are the most unhappy; Korean youth cite after school academies as contributing most to stress; Korea dead last in childhood happiness by 20 points to the next unhappy youth country, Hungary; Korea 34 points lower than the average of other OECD countries' youth happiness; Korean youth felt these subjective anxieties despite objectively placing in the top in OECD in many youth categories like [1] educational opportunity and attainment, [2] material conditions, [3] health, and [4] safety. This reminds me of the nebulous category of subjective happpiness and reminds me of Veenhoven's earlier article about the potential concern of 'unconnectedness' of subjective happiness with material indicators.
--------------
[Editorial] Our unhappy children
It is uncomfortable to ask our children whether they are happy. There is no way we can expect happiness from our children when they are being trained to compete with and defeat their friends almost as soon as they are out of the crib. Yet the Korea Pang Jung-hwan Foundation and Yonsei University Institute for Social Development Studies posed just this question to 6,410 young people. The results were as expected. Compared to the findings of surveys on children in 23 OECD member nations, their subjective happiness ratings put them at dead last by a substantial margin.
South Korea placed a full 34 points lower than the OECD average of 100, with a difference of more than 20 points from the next country up, Hungary.
Given that this is the third straight year, it now seems that psychological anxieties and discontentment are becoming part of the constitution of this country’s children. In particular, children felt these anxieties despite placing among the very top in objective indicators such as educational opportunity and attainment, material conditions, health, and safety.
This can only be the outcome of lives spent being driven around like racehorses. It stems from a structure that is rigidly organized with competition.
In other countries, there has generally been a proportional relationship between educational indices examining things like academic achievement and subjective happiness indices measuring satisfaction with school and home life. In the case of South Korea’s children, however, the relationship between the two has been precisely the inverse. This is almost certainly the result of their being driven to abandon things like human relationships and enter a murderous race for the best grades.
The results also tally with the findings of a study by the Korean Teachers’ and Education Workers’ Union (KTU, Jeon Gyo Jo), which found that 80 percent of children’s stress comes from attending afterschool academies and worries about grades. In addition, children selected money as the most important element in happiness the higher their grade level.
And the children who selected money placed lower on happiness ratings.
This means that as they get older, children are suffering from a severe sense of burden over grades, success, and money.
The problem is apparent. So, too, is the path toward a solution. The first step is to break away from the jungle-like competitiveness of education. The next is to reestablish the framework of education and life to promote family bonds and friendship and cooperation with friends. If the children who carry the future of South Korean society on their shoulders are unhappy, that society cannot be happy. There needs to be a profound awakening from adults.
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/476506.html
1. Mark Whitaker
2. Study of Subjective Quality of Life/Happiness in 23 OECD Nations' Children: Korean Children lowest happiness, by a large margin
3. Korean youth that subjectively value money most are the most unhappy; Korean youth cite after school academies as contributing most to stress; Korea dead last in childhood happiness by 20 points to the next unhappy youth country, Hungary; Korea 34 points lower than the average of other OECD countries' youth happiness; Korean youth felt these subjective anxieties despite objectively placing in the top in OECD in many youth categories like [1] educational opportunity and attainment, [2] material conditions, [3] health, and [4] safety. This reminds me of the nebulous category of subjective happpiness and reminds me of Veenhoven's earlier article about the potential concern of 'unconnectedness' of subjective happiness with material indicators.
--------------
[Editorial] Our unhappy children
It is uncomfortable to ask our children whether they are happy. There is no way we can expect happiness from our children when they are being trained to compete with and defeat their friends almost as soon as they are out of the crib. Yet the Korea Pang Jung-hwan Foundation and Yonsei University Institute for Social Development Studies posed just this question to 6,410 young people. The results were as expected. Compared to the findings of surveys on children in 23 OECD member nations, their subjective happiness ratings put them at dead last by a substantial margin.
South Korea placed a full 34 points lower than the OECD average of 100, with a difference of more than 20 points from the next country up, Hungary.
Given that this is the third straight year, it now seems that psychological anxieties and discontentment are becoming part of the constitution of this country’s children. In particular, children felt these anxieties despite placing among the very top in objective indicators such as educational opportunity and attainment, material conditions, health, and safety.
This can only be the outcome of lives spent being driven around like racehorses. It stems from a structure that is rigidly organized with competition.
In other countries, there has generally been a proportional relationship between educational indices examining things like academic achievement and subjective happiness indices measuring satisfaction with school and home life. In the case of South Korea’s children, however, the relationship between the two has been precisely the inverse. This is almost certainly the result of their being driven to abandon things like human relationships and enter a murderous race for the best grades.
The results also tally with the findings of a study by the Korean Teachers’ and Education Workers’ Union (KTU, Jeon Gyo Jo), which found that 80 percent of children’s stress comes from attending afterschool academies and worries about grades. In addition, children selected money as the most important element in happiness the higher their grade level.
And the children who selected money placed lower on happiness ratings.
This means that as they get older, children are suffering from a severe sense of burden over grades, success, and money.
The problem is apparent. So, too, is the path toward a solution. The first step is to break away from the jungle-like competitiveness of education. The next is to reestablish the framework of education and life to promote family bonds and friendship and cooperation with friends. If the children who carry the future of South Korean society on their shoulders are unhappy, that society cannot be happy. There needs to be a profound awakening from adults.
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_editorial/476506.html
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Week 8: Post your Blog Entries as Comments to my Main Post Each Week
Post by Sunday at midnight.
1. Mark Whitaker
2. The conflict over privatized health care in Korea, when 25% of Koreans are the full time working poor earning less than 860,000 won a month--the highest working poor percentage in the OECD
3. Seeing as how we are in the middle to talking about how consumption and quality of life is altered by different welfare state regimes, here's an editorial from the Korea Times about the conflict in Korea to change the welfare state regime around health care from "Scandinavian style" social rights to "liberal style" defend the market over people. It demonstrates a theme I have mentioned in class before: that in South Korea, there is a fight occuring over the future direction of the welfare state. Esping-Andersen argued that once the welfare state enclosed everyone, it was a political regime that was likely to remain and that only programs that are servicing a small minority are the ones in danger. So I am skeptical that hospitals in Korea will ever be privatized (and thus the prices will go up, and the massive amounts of people will not be covered at all--given Korea has the largest numbers of working poor in the OECD. That article is below as well.) I simply see this as a handful of greedy people attempting to privatize and thus rig the whole system to their tiny benefit against the vast majority that support the current more egalitarian system.
------------------------
INTRODUCTION
"Korea is one of the few OECD countries that do not allow profit-oriented hospitals, along with Japan and the Netherlands."
...
So the first thing Minister Yoon should do before talking about implausible remedial steps is to restore the budget for the public health care service for 2010, which his ministry has slashed to almost half of this year’s. [Government intentionally creating a public health crisis and the offering privatization as their only solution. Creating the crisis themselves.]
Already, the Korean government has been notorious for its meager spending on jobless allowances and other public welfare services, which is one-tenth that of other members of the so-called club of rich countries. If Koreans are deprived of cheap, convenient health care, there will be nothing left for Seoul to say in terms of welfare administration.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/koreatime_admin/LT/common/nview.asp?idx=974&nmode=2
[1]
04-29-2011 21:45
For-profit hospitals
Economic theory to derail medical system
There is at least one area in which economic policymakers should take a backseat. It is dangerous to see hospitals as an industry where free competition is encouraged. [For me, the same goes for agriculture or fisheries.] Korea must delay the introduction of for-profit hospitals until patients are ready to shoulder additional costs.
Strategy-Finance Minister Yoon Jeung-hyun rekindled the debate this week. He backs the scheme to attract foreign investment and ignite competition to improve the quality of medical services. He is right in saying that investor-owned hospitals will upgrade the quality of medical services, and create jobs. He misses the crucial point that upgrading quality entails a hike in costs.
The profit-seeking hospitals are necessary unless this leads to an increase in medical expenses.
It is questionable whether Korea badly needs foreign investment to run its hospitals.
Even without foreign capital, existing hospitals are thriving. As is well known, doctors hold one of the most highly-paid and coveted professions here. Even under state control, Korean doctors are ahead of or on par with Western peers in terms of skills. Many foreign patients visit Korea for treatment. The brightest high-school graduates are opting to enroll at medical schools. This illustrates the profession is still attractive.
With for-profit hospitals, doctors will rush to the highest-paying medical centers, widening the polarization of salaries. Many rural hospitals will disappear due to lack of profitability. Chaebol will build ultra-modern hi-tech hospitals, but only in Seoul and other major cities.
Competition will surely raise medical bills for all. Hospitals will increase money-making services and reduce unprofitable functions. This will help the rich enjoy extensive medical services while the poor will see hardships even in gaining access to hospitals in emergencies. This will create a polarization of medical service coverage.
Even under the current system, salaried people have seen a rapid hike in medical bills, which have been rising faster than wages. A lifting of price control will certainly raise bills.
The OECD reported that Korea would see the fastest rise in medical bills as the population has been aging fast. It sees a widening of the deficit in medical insurance funds, even under the current state-administered formula.
Koreans are still lucky to enjoy universal medical coverage regardless of wealth, status or location. Both the rich and the poor can gain equal access to hospitals, thanks to the egalitarian insurance coverage.
Yoon proposed the limitation of for-profit hospitals to Jeju and free economic zones. But once the plan is in place, all hospitals will become profit-seeking entities. This will surely raise medical fees.
A hasty decision might put the national medical system in an uncontrollable crisis.
Now is the time for Korea to balance quality and cost. A blind focus on quality is certain to raise medical charges and drive out the poor. Patients are ready to wait to see a doctor because it is cheap. The government should not deform the current faulty but efficient medical system.
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/04/137_86145.html
[2]
Why does Korea require egalitarian health coverage? Several more articles with sets of data so we can think about what would happen if egalitarian health coverage were removed in this special Korean context:
04-25-2010 18:48
South Korea Industrial Deaths Highest in OECD [and thus injuries and deaths for the working poor would go up without health care covarege for the ones working full time]
By Lee Hyo-sik
Staff Reporter
South Korea has emerged from the ashes of the 1950-53 Korean War and become one of the world's major economies over the past six decades. But its success has come at the cost of the lives of many dedicated Koreans enduring poor working conditions.
And yet, Asia's fourth-largest economy still remains the most hazardous environment for industrial workers among advanced countries, according to the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Sunday.
It said the nation ranked at the bottom in industrial safety among 21 OECD member economies in 2006, with nearly 21 Korean workers out of every 100,000 dying from a range of industrial accidents.
Mexico was a distant second, as 10 out of every 100,000 workers in the Central American nation were killed in various industrial disasters in 2006, followed by Portugal (6) and Canada (5.9).
Britain was the safest place to work, with only 0.7 out of every 100,000 employees dying on the job, ahead of Norway (1.3) and Switzerland (1.4)
The agency also said industrial deaths here declined only 2 percent in 2006 from the previous year, while Australia and Hungary saw fatal industrial accidents fall by over 10 percent over the one-year period.
"'Despite some differences in the calculating of industrial deaths among OECD countries, Korea's number has been consistently higher than those of developed nations. The Korean government needs to strengthen its oversight of unsafe workplaces and force companies to improve worker safety. Workers themselves should also become more safety conscious," it said.
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/04/113_64827.html
Breakneck Four Rivers schedule faulted for workers deaths
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474166.html
Four Rivers death toll reaches 17
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/473514.html
Four Rivers construction companies reduce contractual expenditures, pocketing $1.8B
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463675.html
[3]
04-26-2011 17:48
Income polarization
Fair society meaningless without middle class
South Korea has shown strong economic performances despite the unprecedented financial crisis that hit the world in 2008. Per-capita national income returned to the $20,000 territory last year with 6.2 percent growth in gross domestic product (GDP). These achievements are now overshadowed by the widening income gap between the rich and the poor.
According to the National Tax Service on Monday, the top 20 percent of self-employed income earners made an average 90 million won ($83,000) last year, up 55 percent from 10 years earlier. On the other hand, the bottom 20 percent saw their income tumble by 54 percent. This finding should serve as a wakeup call to the government on the worsening polarization.
The nation has become a society in which the rich become richer and the poor poorer. The income disparity has already reached a dangerous level, plunging the disadvantaged deeper into dire straits. It also poses a threat to social cohesion and national harmony.
Concerns over the wealth gap have been amplified since the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis. Since then the government has taken a series of measures to strengthen the social safety net, create jobs and ensure equal opportunity. However, these efforts have apparently made little progress in narrowing the disparity.
The [social democratic] liberal government under former Presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun [instead of the Esping-Andersen use of the term] put stress on the redistribution of wealth and welfare of the needy. Unfortunately, they could not attain their lofty goal of narrowing the income divide. The conservative Lee Myung-bak administration is no different although he is trying to usher in a fair society. [I see nothing in his policies to do this, it's empty rhetoric from the current President.]
Past experiences prove that Korea cannot bridge the rich-poor gap with short-term or improvised prescriptions. The embedded cause of the problem lies in the nation’s socioeconomic structure based on excessive concentration of wealth on a small number of businesses and their owners.
Family-controlled conglomerates, or chaebol, are making more money than ever. Workers’ share of national income fell 59.2 percent in 2010 to the lowest level since 2004. This indicates unfair distribution of economic fruit among different economic players.
FOUR POINTS
An estimated 3 million people live in poverty.
An additional 2.5 million are classified as “working poor.”
As many as 8 million are part-time workers who earn about 60 percent of what full-time employees make.
The middle class, the backbone of a democracy [and the backbone of a politics that avoids violent class warfare], has continued to shrink, widening the divide into haves and have-nots.
It is high time that the Lee government shift from a quantitative growth policy to a qualitative one to rebuild the crumbling middle class. Let people enjoy a fair share of the economic pie. This is not to say that the administration should adopt socialist ideas. Closing income polarization is a minimum requirement for maintaining capitalism, market economy and democracy.
[GDP was a term invented by the U.S. military in WWII and into the Cold War. It was thus hardly a useful plan for anything else except military interests.]
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/04/172_85918.html
[4]
02-23-2010 17:30 News List
Number of 'Short-Hour' Workers Rising
By Kim Hyun-cheol
Staff Reporter
The number of those who worked less than 3.5 hours per day on average reached 963,000 last year, accounting for a record high of 4.1 percent of all Korean workers.
Statistics Korea reported Tuesday that since the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, the number of part-time workers has been on the rise, jumping from 1.6 percent in 1997 to 2.4 percent in 1998, to 2.9 percent in 2001 and to 3.3 percent in 2004.
People working 18 to 25 hours a week numbered 1.13 million last year, more than doubling from 558,000 in 1997.
The number of those working long hours, in contrast, has been declining over the same period.
The number of employees working more than 54 hours a week was tallied at 6.74 million, taking up 28.7 percent of all workers here.
The proportion of such workers has been steadily dropping since 2001, when they accounted for 42.1 percent of domestic employees.
[so 2001: 42.1% full time employees at more than 54 hours a week;
to 2011: 28.7% full time employees at more than 54 hours a week]
The statistics show that there could be a larger "working poor" class than officially accounted for here.
"It looks like there is already a substantial number of jobless people in Korean society," said Jung Yu-hoon, a researcher at Hyundai Research Institute.
Such a change in working hours is partly attributable to the recent trend of avoiding overtime, as well as a rise in workers voluntarily turning to temporary jobs.
Korea's jobless rate soared to 5 percent last month, the highest since March 2001, and the number of the jobless hit a 10-year high of 1.22 million. The youth unemployment rate also rose 1.1 percentage points to 9.3 percent.
The Lee Myung-bak administration pledged it would create 1.2 million jobs during its term, but the results to this point are far from the target.
In 2008, the administration's first year, 145,000 more people were hired compared to the previous year. However, the number fell by 72,000 in 2009.
hckim@koreatimes.co.kr
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/02/123_61283.html
[5]
SK claims highest rate of low-wage employment in OECD; edge of OECD
S.Korea claims highest rate of low-wage employment in OECD
Experts say S.Korea should institute livelihood support and job creation to assist the working poor
By Hong Seock-jae
The ranks of the working poor are swelling. Members of this group, who are unable to escape from poverty no matter how hard they work, walk a tightrope getting by from day to day amid straitened circumstances, with the strong possibility of falling directly into the poverty class if they experience a sudden illness or unemployment.
Last year, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) announced that South Korea had the highest rate of low-wage employment among all its member nations, with its 25.6 percent rate putting it ahead of the United States (24.5 percent) and Japan (15.4 percent). In terms of the poverty rate among households with employed members, South Korea was far above the average for OECD member nations.
According to 2010 figures from Statistics Korea, a full 2.11 million workers in the country had earnings falling below the legal minimum wage of just 858,990 Won ($767) per month, or 4,110 Won ($3.67) per hour. Five years have passed since the 2006 creation of the Irregular Workers Protection Act, yet around 12.7 percent of workers are living below even the minimum wage.
A Korea Labor Institute report titled “Working Poverty-The Effects of Labor Market Uncertainty on Poverty” also indicated a trend of yearly increase in the poverty rate for households headed by someone of employable age (15 to 64 years), with a rise from 8.5 percent in 1997 to 10.9 percent in 2008.
Working poverty refers to a situation in which a household is classified as poor even though the head of household is at working age (18 to 65 years) and there is at least one person employed within the household. The increase has been in the percentage of families falling into this category. The leading example is the “880 thousand Won household,” earning its title because it receives the monthly pay of 880 thousand Won as calculated in 2007 by multiplying the 1.19 million Won average pay of irregular workers by 73 percent, representing the average relative pay rate for individuals in their twenties. In many cases, people are unable to escape from poverty despite engaging in high-intensity work, including small business operators, migrant workers, and artists, including film workers such as 32-year-old screenwriter/director Choe Go-eun, who died alone from poverty-related causes in a small rented room last month.
Experts said that the phenomenon could spread as even efforts to keep step with growth and distribution break down.
“Working poverty is a multidimensional and dynamic phenomena that is hard to capture through simplistic past concepts of poverty,” said KLI researcher Eun Soo-mi. “It assumes a structural form that reproduces a ‘triangular vicious cycle,’ where irregular employment leads to things like unemployment, thrusting workers into the poverty trap.”
The increase in irregular employment has also contributed to acceleration of the working poverty phenomenon, in which people have to struggle with poverty even while working. A 2009 supplementary census on economic activity showed that nearly half of irregular workers, or 41.1 percent, were struggling with low wages.
Experts said a linkage needs to be established between livelihood support for the working poor and job creation policy. They also stressed the need for a “secondary social safety net” for those without any access to social insurance and the basic livelihood security system.
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463674.html
Protests continue as courts pay cleaning workers below minimum wage [even the Korean government breaks its own laws in paying its state workers]
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/464247.html
[Esping-Andersen said it depends on political organization, though upon looking at Korea, it seems that any working class movements are highly constrained in Korea to act on these material difficulties they face, because of repressive governments and a growing lack of civil rights in South Korea.]:
[6]
If political rights are included in your definition of quality of life, Korea's rate is going backwards:
U.N. rapporteur reports freedom of expression severely curtailed under Lee administration
The report supports continued criticism that human rights have been greatly curtailed by the Lee administration
» The report by U.N. Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression Frank La Rue entitled “Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, and Culture Rights, Including the Right to Development” to be submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council.
By Son Jun-hyun, Senior Staff Writer
A report that is to be submitted to the United Nations this year states that freedom of expression has receded substantially in South Korea under the Lee Myung-bak administration and recommends that the South Korean government initiate improvements. The report, written by U.N. Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression Frank La Rue following a May 2010 visit and investigation, serves as an important measure of the human rights situation in the country and is expected to draw charges from the international community that South Korea is an underdeveloped human rights nation.
The English-language report titled “Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, and Culture Rights, Including the Right to Development,” a copy of which was acquired Wednesday by the Hankyoreh, states that the scope of freedom of expression has diminished in South Korea since the candlelight vigil demonstrations against the full-scale resumption of U.S. beef imports in 2008.
The report also noted an increasing number of cases where individuals who present opinions that do not agree with the government’s position are prosecuted and punished based on domestic laws and regulations that do not conform to international law.
Over its length of 28 A4-sized pages, the report includes expressions of concern about or recommendations of amendments to the South Korean human rights situation in eight areas, including defamation and freedom of opinion and expression on the Internet, freedoms of opinion and expression during election campaigns, freedom of assembly, restrictions on freedom of opinion and expression for reasons of national security, and rights to free opinion and expression for government employees.
Citing the arrest of television news show producers who reported on U.S. beef, La Rue said that a number of criminal defamation lawsuits are being lodged in cases of expression for the public good and used to punish individuals who criticize the administration. Noting that prohibitions on defamation are also stipulated in civil law, La Rue recommended that the crime of defamation be deleted from the criminal code.
La Rue also made reference to a suit filed by the National Intelligence Service (NIS) claiming damages from Hope Institute Executive Director Park Won-soon for defamation. La Rue said that government officials and public institutions should refrain from filing civil suits on defamation charges in the interest of citizen monitoring of public officials.
La Rue welcomed a December unconstitutionality ruling on the Framework Act on Telecommunications, which has been abused to restrict freedom of opinion on the Internet, as witnessed in the “Minerva” case. With regard to the Internet real name system, he recommended examining other means of identity verification and applying the system only in cases where there are substantial grounds for believing the individual will commit a crime.
La Rue also recommended the abolition of the Korea Communication Standards Commission (KOCSC), expressing concern about the fact that the KOCSC is empowered to review and reject or suspend information whose distribution is prohibited by the Information and Communications Network Act, including information deemed defamatory or a matter of national confidentiality. He expressed concerns that the KOCSC, whose members are appointed by the president, might function as what amounts to a censorship organization deleting online criticisms of the administration, and he remarked on the absence of sufficient safeguards to prevent this.
La Rue recommended remedial measures to address the practice South Korea’s notification system for assemblies, which in effect has operated as a permit system. La Rue also recommended remedial measures to address in addition to the failure to properly guarantee freedoms of political opinion and expression for public school teachers, and he urged the abolition of Item 7 of the National Security Act stipulating punishment for acts of praise and sympathy for anti-state groups.
“The Lee Myung-bak administration, which goes on about ‘advanced Korea’ every time it opens its mouth, suffered a major embarrassment from the international human rights community despite being a U.N. Human Rights Council member nation,” said former National Human Rights Commission of Korea Policy Director Kim Hyung-wan. “The international embarrassment could have been avoided if the NHRCK had just done its job faithfully.”
La Rue submitted the report to the South Korean government on Jan. 31. It was confirmed that around ten government institutions, including the Ministry of Justice, the NHRCK, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MCST), the KCC, and the National Police Agency, have been examining the truth of the report’s claims since Feb. 14.
This is the first report from a U.N. special rapporteur for freedom of opinion and expression issuing recommendations to the government regarding the domestic human rights situation since a report issued 16 years ago in 1995 by Abid Hussain. At the time, Hussain recommended abolition of the National Security Act and the release of those imprisoned for exercise of freedom of expression.
A human rights group official who claimed to have examined the report said that it contained “a relatively accurate picture of the regression of human rights in South Korea.”
“Unlike the reports by international NGOs or individual countries, a U.N. report carries a high level of reliability and influence,” the official said.
The report is scheduled to be officially delivered to the UNHRC in June.
An official with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the report was “a draft for which Mr. La Rue requested that the South Korean government verify the accuracy of the content prior to formal submission to the UNHRC.”
“We are still in the stage of gathering opinions from the different offices and ministries, so if a government opinion is issued, I imagine it can be done at the official announcement in June at the UNHRC meeting,” the official added.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463878.html
[La Rue additionally complained he was shadowed by police agents and spied upon from Lee's Administration while he was in South Korea.]
Union members targeted by companies for claims
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474511.html
Abuse of authoritarian-era law rife under Lee administration, says DLP chairwoman
"Democratic Labor Party Chairwoman Lee Jung-hee raised charges Monday of unreasonable police investigations for National Security Act violations, noting that the number of bookings under the Lee Myung-bak administration increased by 2.5 times over the Roh Moo-hyun administration while the indictment rate fell by half.
“The three years of the Lee Myung-bak administration have seen a sharp rise in the number of people booked on charges of violating the National Security Act, yet the number of individuals indicted has dropped substantially,” Lee Jung-hee said. “This shows the unreasonable numbers-focused law enforcement efforts of the police and their abuse of the National Security Act.”"
...
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/465868.html
=============================
AN ARTICLE ON GENDER QUALITY OF LIFE AND WELFARE STATE
Women paying a steep price for maternity leave
Womenlink reveals taboo actions by major corporations to push out women requesting or returning from maternity leave
By Lee You-jin
“Kim,” 33, an employee at one of South Korea’s most well-known corporations, received the lowest marks possible in her performance assessment after returning early this year from maternity leave.
“I worked until I was eight months pregnant and my legs were all swollen to finish my duties,” she said. “How can this happen?”
“(The government) went on and on about how I should have the baby, and when I actually did the company treated me poorly,” she added.
At another major company, a woman in her thirties with three-and-a-half years of service was paged by the company last year while on maternity leave. When she arrived, she was urged to resign, finally quitting the company after repeated pressure.
An examination of counseling sessions shows that taboo practices by companies in connection with working women’s pregnancies and childbirth are persisting today. According to an analysis of 440 cases of counseling between January 2010 and March 2011 by the Korean Womenlink employment equality counseling office, labor counseling cases in connection with pregnancy and childbirth accounted for 116 of them, or 26.4 percent. Of these, terminations accounted for 30 cases, or 25.9 percent, leave-related counseling for 41 cases, or 35.3 percent, and prejudicial personnel treatment for 14 cases, or 12 percent.
“In most of these cases, women find it impossible to get promotions after giving birth or they end up with a gap in their work experience,” said Lee So-hui, an volunteer with the office.
Following a battery of counseling sessions over the month of April, the National Employment Equality Counseling Office Network found many examples of retirement recommendations and prejudicial personnel treatment in the case of regular positions, and examples of employees being unable to use their allotted one year of child leave during their contract period in the case of temporary employees.
“Recently, large corporations have been trying to terminate longstanding female employees with high salaries,” said Seoul Women Workers’ Association secretary-general Lee Bu-min. “The bigger problem in the case of temporary positions was the very option of child leave being closed off.”
According to the government’s employment insurance database, the number of individuals taking pre- and post-childbirth leave rose from 70,560 in 2009 to 75,742 in 2010, and the number of individuals taking child leave from 35,400 in 2009 to 41,733 in 2010.
However, the trend of increase has dropped off, with the rate of increase among individuals taking pre- and post-childbirth leave plummeting from 17.4 percentage points in 2008 to 2.9 percentage points in 2009 before recovering slightly to 7.3 percentage points for 2010. In the case of child leave, the rate of increase has declined continuously, from 37.6 percentage points in 2008 to 21.5 percentage points in 2009 and 17.8 percentage points in 2010. Women’s groups are saying the reason for this is linked with the increase in temporary positions stemming from the poor economic climate.
The government changed its method of providing child leave pay support in 2011, adjusting the level from its previous set amount of 500 thousand won ($460.88) per month to up to 40 percent of pre-leave pay or a maximum of one million won, and it has undertaken efforts to effect improvements in corporate culture, including the holding of various forums. However, its efforts face clear limitations owing to the lack of any way of punishing companies.
An official with the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, “At the moment, there are no clear policy measures for pressuring companies into supporting working women during their pregnancy and childbirth, so we have no choice but to hope for understanding from their colleagues and improvements in corporate culture.”
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474881.html
1. Mark Whitaker
2. The conflict over privatized health care in Korea, when 25% of Koreans are the full time working poor earning less than 860,000 won a month--the highest working poor percentage in the OECD
3. Seeing as how we are in the middle to talking about how consumption and quality of life is altered by different welfare state regimes, here's an editorial from the Korea Times about the conflict in Korea to change the welfare state regime around health care from "Scandinavian style" social rights to "liberal style" defend the market over people. It demonstrates a theme I have mentioned in class before: that in South Korea, there is a fight occuring over the future direction of the welfare state. Esping-Andersen argued that once the welfare state enclosed everyone, it was a political regime that was likely to remain and that only programs that are servicing a small minority are the ones in danger. So I am skeptical that hospitals in Korea will ever be privatized (and thus the prices will go up, and the massive amounts of people will not be covered at all--given Korea has the largest numbers of working poor in the OECD. That article is below as well.) I simply see this as a handful of greedy people attempting to privatize and thus rig the whole system to their tiny benefit against the vast majority that support the current more egalitarian system.
------------------------
INTRODUCTION
"Korea is one of the few OECD countries that do not allow profit-oriented hospitals, along with Japan and the Netherlands."
...
So the first thing Minister Yoon should do before talking about implausible remedial steps is to restore the budget for the public health care service for 2010, which his ministry has slashed to almost half of this year’s. [Government intentionally creating a public health crisis and the offering privatization as their only solution. Creating the crisis themselves.]
Already, the Korean government has been notorious for its meager spending on jobless allowances and other public welfare services, which is one-tenth that of other members of the so-called club of rich countries. If Koreans are deprived of cheap, convenient health care, there will be nothing left for Seoul to say in terms of welfare administration.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/koreatime_admin/LT/common/nview.asp?idx=974&nmode=2
[1]
04-29-2011 21:45
For-profit hospitals
Economic theory to derail medical system
There is at least one area in which economic policymakers should take a backseat. It is dangerous to see hospitals as an industry where free competition is encouraged. [For me, the same goes for agriculture or fisheries.] Korea must delay the introduction of for-profit hospitals until patients are ready to shoulder additional costs.
Strategy-Finance Minister Yoon Jeung-hyun rekindled the debate this week. He backs the scheme to attract foreign investment and ignite competition to improve the quality of medical services. He is right in saying that investor-owned hospitals will upgrade the quality of medical services, and create jobs. He misses the crucial point that upgrading quality entails a hike in costs.
The profit-seeking hospitals are necessary unless this leads to an increase in medical expenses.
It is questionable whether Korea badly needs foreign investment to run its hospitals.
Even without foreign capital, existing hospitals are thriving. As is well known, doctors hold one of the most highly-paid and coveted professions here. Even under state control, Korean doctors are ahead of or on par with Western peers in terms of skills. Many foreign patients visit Korea for treatment. The brightest high-school graduates are opting to enroll at medical schools. This illustrates the profession is still attractive.
With for-profit hospitals, doctors will rush to the highest-paying medical centers, widening the polarization of salaries. Many rural hospitals will disappear due to lack of profitability. Chaebol will build ultra-modern hi-tech hospitals, but only in Seoul and other major cities.
Competition will surely raise medical bills for all. Hospitals will increase money-making services and reduce unprofitable functions. This will help the rich enjoy extensive medical services while the poor will see hardships even in gaining access to hospitals in emergencies. This will create a polarization of medical service coverage.
Even under the current system, salaried people have seen a rapid hike in medical bills, which have been rising faster than wages. A lifting of price control will certainly raise bills.
The OECD reported that Korea would see the fastest rise in medical bills as the population has been aging fast. It sees a widening of the deficit in medical insurance funds, even under the current state-administered formula.
Koreans are still lucky to enjoy universal medical coverage regardless of wealth, status or location. Both the rich and the poor can gain equal access to hospitals, thanks to the egalitarian insurance coverage.
Yoon proposed the limitation of for-profit hospitals to Jeju and free economic zones. But once the plan is in place, all hospitals will become profit-seeking entities. This will surely raise medical fees.
A hasty decision might put the national medical system in an uncontrollable crisis.
Now is the time for Korea to balance quality and cost. A blind focus on quality is certain to raise medical charges and drive out the poor. Patients are ready to wait to see a doctor because it is cheap. The government should not deform the current faulty but efficient medical system.
http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/04/137_86145.html
[2]
Why does Korea require egalitarian health coverage? Several more articles with sets of data so we can think about what would happen if egalitarian health coverage were removed in this special Korean context:
04-25-2010 18:48
South Korea Industrial Deaths Highest in OECD [and thus injuries and deaths for the working poor would go up without health care covarege for the ones working full time]
By Lee Hyo-sik
Staff Reporter
South Korea has emerged from the ashes of the 1950-53 Korean War and become one of the world's major economies over the past six decades. But its success has come at the cost of the lives of many dedicated Koreans enduring poor working conditions.
And yet, Asia's fourth-largest economy still remains the most hazardous environment for industrial workers among advanced countries, according to the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Sunday.
It said the nation ranked at the bottom in industrial safety among 21 OECD member economies in 2006, with nearly 21 Korean workers out of every 100,000 dying from a range of industrial accidents.
Mexico was a distant second, as 10 out of every 100,000 workers in the Central American nation were killed in various industrial disasters in 2006, followed by Portugal (6) and Canada (5.9).
Britain was the safest place to work, with only 0.7 out of every 100,000 employees dying on the job, ahead of Norway (1.3) and Switzerland (1.4)
The agency also said industrial deaths here declined only 2 percent in 2006 from the previous year, while Australia and Hungary saw fatal industrial accidents fall by over 10 percent over the one-year period.
"'Despite some differences in the calculating of industrial deaths among OECD countries, Korea's number has been consistently higher than those of developed nations. The Korean government needs to strengthen its oversight of unsafe workplaces and force companies to improve worker safety. Workers themselves should also become more safety conscious," it said.
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2010/04/113_64827.html
Breakneck Four Rivers schedule faulted for workers deaths
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474166.html
Four Rivers death toll reaches 17
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/473514.html
Four Rivers construction companies reduce contractual expenditures, pocketing $1.8B
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463675.html
[3]
04-26-2011 17:48
Income polarization
Fair society meaningless without middle class
South Korea has shown strong economic performances despite the unprecedented financial crisis that hit the world in 2008. Per-capita national income returned to the $20,000 territory last year with 6.2 percent growth in gross domestic product (GDP). These achievements are now overshadowed by the widening income gap between the rich and the poor.
According to the National Tax Service on Monday, the top 20 percent of self-employed income earners made an average 90 million won ($83,000) last year, up 55 percent from 10 years earlier. On the other hand, the bottom 20 percent saw their income tumble by 54 percent. This finding should serve as a wakeup call to the government on the worsening polarization.
The nation has become a society in which the rich become richer and the poor poorer. The income disparity has already reached a dangerous level, plunging the disadvantaged deeper into dire straits. It also poses a threat to social cohesion and national harmony.
Concerns over the wealth gap have been amplified since the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis. Since then the government has taken a series of measures to strengthen the social safety net, create jobs and ensure equal opportunity. However, these efforts have apparently made little progress in narrowing the disparity.
The [social democratic] liberal government under former Presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun [instead of the Esping-Andersen use of the term] put stress on the redistribution of wealth and welfare of the needy. Unfortunately, they could not attain their lofty goal of narrowing the income divide. The conservative Lee Myung-bak administration is no different although he is trying to usher in a fair society. [I see nothing in his policies to do this, it's empty rhetoric from the current President.]
Past experiences prove that Korea cannot bridge the rich-poor gap with short-term or improvised prescriptions. The embedded cause of the problem lies in the nation’s socioeconomic structure based on excessive concentration of wealth on a small number of businesses and their owners.
Family-controlled conglomerates, or chaebol, are making more money than ever. Workers’ share of national income fell 59.2 percent in 2010 to the lowest level since 2004. This indicates unfair distribution of economic fruit among different economic players.
FOUR POINTS
An estimated 3 million people live in poverty.
An additional 2.5 million are classified as “working poor.”
As many as 8 million are part-time workers who earn about 60 percent of what full-time employees make.
The middle class, the backbone of a democracy [and the backbone of a politics that avoids violent class warfare], has continued to shrink, widening the divide into haves and have-nots.
It is high time that the Lee government shift from a quantitative growth policy to a qualitative one to rebuild the crumbling middle class. Let people enjoy a fair share of the economic pie. This is not to say that the administration should adopt socialist ideas. Closing income polarization is a minimum requirement for maintaining capitalism, market economy and democracy.
[GDP was a term invented by the U.S. military in WWII and into the Cold War. It was thus hardly a useful plan for anything else except military interests.]
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/04/172_85918.html
[4]
02-23-2010 17:30 News List
Number of 'Short-Hour' Workers Rising
By Kim Hyun-cheol
Staff Reporter
The number of those who worked less than 3.5 hours per day on average reached 963,000 last year, accounting for a record high of 4.1 percent of all Korean workers.
Statistics Korea reported Tuesday that since the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, the number of part-time workers has been on the rise, jumping from 1.6 percent in 1997 to 2.4 percent in 1998, to 2.9 percent in 2001 and to 3.3 percent in 2004.
People working 18 to 25 hours a week numbered 1.13 million last year, more than doubling from 558,000 in 1997.
The number of those working long hours, in contrast, has been declining over the same period.
The number of employees working more than 54 hours a week was tallied at 6.74 million, taking up 28.7 percent of all workers here.
The proportion of such workers has been steadily dropping since 2001, when they accounted for 42.1 percent of domestic employees.
[so 2001: 42.1% full time employees at more than 54 hours a week;
to 2011: 28.7% full time employees at more than 54 hours a week]
The statistics show that there could be a larger "working poor" class than officially accounted for here.
"It looks like there is already a substantial number of jobless people in Korean society," said Jung Yu-hoon, a researcher at Hyundai Research Institute.
Such a change in working hours is partly attributable to the recent trend of avoiding overtime, as well as a rise in workers voluntarily turning to temporary jobs.
Korea's jobless rate soared to 5 percent last month, the highest since March 2001, and the number of the jobless hit a 10-year high of 1.22 million. The youth unemployment rate also rose 1.1 percentage points to 9.3 percent.
The Lee Myung-bak administration pledged it would create 1.2 million jobs during its term, but the results to this point are far from the target.
In 2008, the administration's first year, 145,000 more people were hired compared to the previous year. However, the number fell by 72,000 in 2009.
hckim@koreatimes.co.kr
---
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/02/123_61283.html
[5]
SK claims highest rate of low-wage employment in OECD; edge of OECD
S.Korea claims highest rate of low-wage employment in OECD
Experts say S.Korea should institute livelihood support and job creation to assist the working poor
By Hong Seock-jae
The ranks of the working poor are swelling. Members of this group, who are unable to escape from poverty no matter how hard they work, walk a tightrope getting by from day to day amid straitened circumstances, with the strong possibility of falling directly into the poverty class if they experience a sudden illness or unemployment.
Last year, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) announced that South Korea had the highest rate of low-wage employment among all its member nations, with its 25.6 percent rate putting it ahead of the United States (24.5 percent) and Japan (15.4 percent). In terms of the poverty rate among households with employed members, South Korea was far above the average for OECD member nations.
According to 2010 figures from Statistics Korea, a full 2.11 million workers in the country had earnings falling below the legal minimum wage of just 858,990 Won ($767) per month, or 4,110 Won ($3.67) per hour. Five years have passed since the 2006 creation of the Irregular Workers Protection Act, yet around 12.7 percent of workers are living below even the minimum wage.
A Korea Labor Institute report titled “Working Poverty-The Effects of Labor Market Uncertainty on Poverty” also indicated a trend of yearly increase in the poverty rate for households headed by someone of employable age (15 to 64 years), with a rise from 8.5 percent in 1997 to 10.9 percent in 2008.
Working poverty refers to a situation in which a household is classified as poor even though the head of household is at working age (18 to 65 years) and there is at least one person employed within the household. The increase has been in the percentage of families falling into this category. The leading example is the “880 thousand Won household,” earning its title because it receives the monthly pay of 880 thousand Won as calculated in 2007 by multiplying the 1.19 million Won average pay of irregular workers by 73 percent, representing the average relative pay rate for individuals in their twenties. In many cases, people are unable to escape from poverty despite engaging in high-intensity work, including small business operators, migrant workers, and artists, including film workers such as 32-year-old screenwriter/director Choe Go-eun, who died alone from poverty-related causes in a small rented room last month.
Experts said that the phenomenon could spread as even efforts to keep step with growth and distribution break down.
“Working poverty is a multidimensional and dynamic phenomena that is hard to capture through simplistic past concepts of poverty,” said KLI researcher Eun Soo-mi. “It assumes a structural form that reproduces a ‘triangular vicious cycle,’ where irregular employment leads to things like unemployment, thrusting workers into the poverty trap.”
The increase in irregular employment has also contributed to acceleration of the working poverty phenomenon, in which people have to struggle with poverty even while working. A 2009 supplementary census on economic activity showed that nearly half of irregular workers, or 41.1 percent, were struggling with low wages.
Experts said a linkage needs to be established between livelihood support for the working poor and job creation policy. They also stressed the need for a “secondary social safety net” for those without any access to social insurance and the basic livelihood security system.
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463674.html
Protests continue as courts pay cleaning workers below minimum wage [even the Korean government breaks its own laws in paying its state workers]
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/464247.html
[Esping-Andersen said it depends on political organization, though upon looking at Korea, it seems that any working class movements are highly constrained in Korea to act on these material difficulties they face, because of repressive governments and a growing lack of civil rights in South Korea.]:
[6]
If political rights are included in your definition of quality of life, Korea's rate is going backwards:
U.N. rapporteur reports freedom of expression severely curtailed under Lee administration
The report supports continued criticism that human rights have been greatly curtailed by the Lee administration
» The report by U.N. Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression Frank La Rue entitled “Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, and Culture Rights, Including the Right to Development” to be submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Council.
By Son Jun-hyun, Senior Staff Writer
A report that is to be submitted to the United Nations this year states that freedom of expression has receded substantially in South Korea under the Lee Myung-bak administration and recommends that the South Korean government initiate improvements. The report, written by U.N. Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression Frank La Rue following a May 2010 visit and investigation, serves as an important measure of the human rights situation in the country and is expected to draw charges from the international community that South Korea is an underdeveloped human rights nation.
The English-language report titled “Promotion and Protection of All Human Rights, Civil, Political, Economic, and Culture Rights, Including the Right to Development,” a copy of which was acquired Wednesday by the Hankyoreh, states that the scope of freedom of expression has diminished in South Korea since the candlelight vigil demonstrations against the full-scale resumption of U.S. beef imports in 2008.
The report also noted an increasing number of cases where individuals who present opinions that do not agree with the government’s position are prosecuted and punished based on domestic laws and regulations that do not conform to international law.
Over its length of 28 A4-sized pages, the report includes expressions of concern about or recommendations of amendments to the South Korean human rights situation in eight areas, including defamation and freedom of opinion and expression on the Internet, freedoms of opinion and expression during election campaigns, freedom of assembly, restrictions on freedom of opinion and expression for reasons of national security, and rights to free opinion and expression for government employees.
Citing the arrest of television news show producers who reported on U.S. beef, La Rue said that a number of criminal defamation lawsuits are being lodged in cases of expression for the public good and used to punish individuals who criticize the administration. Noting that prohibitions on defamation are also stipulated in civil law, La Rue recommended that the crime of defamation be deleted from the criminal code.
La Rue also made reference to a suit filed by the National Intelligence Service (NIS) claiming damages from Hope Institute Executive Director Park Won-soon for defamation. La Rue said that government officials and public institutions should refrain from filing civil suits on defamation charges in the interest of citizen monitoring of public officials.
La Rue welcomed a December unconstitutionality ruling on the Framework Act on Telecommunications, which has been abused to restrict freedom of opinion on the Internet, as witnessed in the “Minerva” case. With regard to the Internet real name system, he recommended examining other means of identity verification and applying the system only in cases where there are substantial grounds for believing the individual will commit a crime.
La Rue also recommended the abolition of the Korea Communication Standards Commission (KOCSC), expressing concern about the fact that the KOCSC is empowered to review and reject or suspend information whose distribution is prohibited by the Information and Communications Network Act, including information deemed defamatory or a matter of national confidentiality. He expressed concerns that the KOCSC, whose members are appointed by the president, might function as what amounts to a censorship organization deleting online criticisms of the administration, and he remarked on the absence of sufficient safeguards to prevent this.
La Rue recommended remedial measures to address the practice South Korea’s notification system for assemblies, which in effect has operated as a permit system. La Rue also recommended remedial measures to address in addition to the failure to properly guarantee freedoms of political opinion and expression for public school teachers, and he urged the abolition of Item 7 of the National Security Act stipulating punishment for acts of praise and sympathy for anti-state groups.
“The Lee Myung-bak administration, which goes on about ‘advanced Korea’ every time it opens its mouth, suffered a major embarrassment from the international human rights community despite being a U.N. Human Rights Council member nation,” said former National Human Rights Commission of Korea Policy Director Kim Hyung-wan. “The international embarrassment could have been avoided if the NHRCK had just done its job faithfully.”
La Rue submitted the report to the South Korean government on Jan. 31. It was confirmed that around ten government institutions, including the Ministry of Justice, the NHRCK, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MCST), the KCC, and the National Police Agency, have been examining the truth of the report’s claims since Feb. 14.
This is the first report from a U.N. special rapporteur for freedom of opinion and expression issuing recommendations to the government regarding the domestic human rights situation since a report issued 16 years ago in 1995 by Abid Hussain. At the time, Hussain recommended abolition of the National Security Act and the release of those imprisoned for exercise of freedom of expression.
A human rights group official who claimed to have examined the report said that it contained “a relatively accurate picture of the regression of human rights in South Korea.”
“Unlike the reports by international NGOs or individual countries, a U.N. report carries a high level of reliability and influence,” the official said.
The report is scheduled to be officially delivered to the UNHRC in June.
An official with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the report was “a draft for which Mr. La Rue requested that the South Korean government verify the accuracy of the content prior to formal submission to the UNHRC.”
“We are still in the stage of gathering opinions from the different offices and ministries, so if a government opinion is issued, I imagine it can be done at the official announcement in June at the UNHRC meeting,” the official added.
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/463878.html
[La Rue additionally complained he was shadowed by police agents and spied upon from Lee's Administration while he was in South Korea.]
Union members targeted by companies for claims
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474511.html
Abuse of authoritarian-era law rife under Lee administration, says DLP chairwoman
"Democratic Labor Party Chairwoman Lee Jung-hee raised charges Monday of unreasonable police investigations for National Security Act violations, noting that the number of bookings under the Lee Myung-bak administration increased by 2.5 times over the Roh Moo-hyun administration while the indictment rate fell by half.
“The three years of the Lee Myung-bak administration have seen a sharp rise in the number of people booked on charges of violating the National Security Act, yet the number of individuals indicted has dropped substantially,” Lee Jung-hee said. “This shows the unreasonable numbers-focused law enforcement efforts of the police and their abuse of the National Security Act.”"
...
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/465868.html
=============================
AN ARTICLE ON GENDER QUALITY OF LIFE AND WELFARE STATE
Women paying a steep price for maternity leave
Womenlink reveals taboo actions by major corporations to push out women requesting or returning from maternity leave
By Lee You-jin
“Kim,” 33, an employee at one of South Korea’s most well-known corporations, received the lowest marks possible in her performance assessment after returning early this year from maternity leave.
“I worked until I was eight months pregnant and my legs were all swollen to finish my duties,” she said. “How can this happen?”
“(The government) went on and on about how I should have the baby, and when I actually did the company treated me poorly,” she added.
At another major company, a woman in her thirties with three-and-a-half years of service was paged by the company last year while on maternity leave. When she arrived, she was urged to resign, finally quitting the company after repeated pressure.
An examination of counseling sessions shows that taboo practices by companies in connection with working women’s pregnancies and childbirth are persisting today. According to an analysis of 440 cases of counseling between January 2010 and March 2011 by the Korean Womenlink employment equality counseling office, labor counseling cases in connection with pregnancy and childbirth accounted for 116 of them, or 26.4 percent. Of these, terminations accounted for 30 cases, or 25.9 percent, leave-related counseling for 41 cases, or 35.3 percent, and prejudicial personnel treatment for 14 cases, or 12 percent.
“In most of these cases, women find it impossible to get promotions after giving birth or they end up with a gap in their work experience,” said Lee So-hui, an volunteer with the office.
Following a battery of counseling sessions over the month of April, the National Employment Equality Counseling Office Network found many examples of retirement recommendations and prejudicial personnel treatment in the case of regular positions, and examples of employees being unable to use their allotted one year of child leave during their contract period in the case of temporary employees.
“Recently, large corporations have been trying to terminate longstanding female employees with high salaries,” said Seoul Women Workers’ Association secretary-general Lee Bu-min. “The bigger problem in the case of temporary positions was the very option of child leave being closed off.”
According to the government’s employment insurance database, the number of individuals taking pre- and post-childbirth leave rose from 70,560 in 2009 to 75,742 in 2010, and the number of individuals taking child leave from 35,400 in 2009 to 41,733 in 2010.
However, the trend of increase has dropped off, with the rate of increase among individuals taking pre- and post-childbirth leave plummeting from 17.4 percentage points in 2008 to 2.9 percentage points in 2009 before recovering slightly to 7.3 percentage points for 2010. In the case of child leave, the rate of increase has declined continuously, from 37.6 percentage points in 2008 to 21.5 percentage points in 2009 and 17.8 percentage points in 2010. Women’s groups are saying the reason for this is linked with the increase in temporary positions stemming from the poor economic climate.
The government changed its method of providing child leave pay support in 2011, adjusting the level from its previous set amount of 500 thousand won ($460.88) per month to up to 40 percent of pre-leave pay or a maximum of one million won, and it has undertaken efforts to effect improvements in corporate culture, including the holding of various forums. However, its efforts face clear limitations owing to the lack of any way of punishing companies.
An official with the Ministry of Health and Welfare said, “At the moment, there are no clear policy measures for pressuring companies into supporting working women during their pregnancy and childbirth, so we have no choice but to hope for understanding from their colleagues and improvements in corporate culture.”
---
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/474881.html
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Week 7: No blog posting during mid-term week
No blog posting during mid-term week. No class sessions either. See syllabus.
The extra credit exam will be uploaded to the Kookmin website this weekend. It is due next time we meet. Print a copy of your answers and bring it to class, after mid-term week.
--------
VARIOUS NEWS ABOUT MEASURING HAPPINESS
1. Mark Whitaker
2. The Age Curve of Aggregate Subjective Happiness?
Another variable to integrate into happiness models when testing for subjective happiness is mentioned below in some recent research. Thus observations of subjective happiness subjectively should be weighted by age or studies should at least test three different 'regions' of age to see if it holds true in all societies or see if this observation changes over time, or different 'regions' of happiness and 'grumpyness' move around over time in their boundaries.
---------------
Happiness is U-shaped ... which explains why the middle-aged are grumpy
Happiness follows a U-shaped curve during a person's lifetime, according to research showing that middle-aged people are the unhappiest.
Stephen Adams
By Stephen Adams 11:30PM BST 17 Apr 2011
39 Comments
Satisfaction with life starts to drop as early as a person's late 20s and does not begin to recover until well past 50, says Bert van Landeghem, an economist at Maastricht University in Belgium.
While young adults are carefree and full of hope for the future and the over-50s have come to terms with the trials of life, the research indicates that those in the middle feel weighed down by the demands on them.
The study found "a substantial dip in happiness during the middle of people's lives is the equivalent to becoming unemployed or losing a family member".
The conclusions come in a study of how people perceive their wellbeing.
Mr van Landeghem, who is 29, will present his research at the Royal Economic Society annual conference at Royal Holloway, the University of London, this week.
Related Articles
*
Happiness peaks in our eighties
28 Mar 2011
*
Britons 'increasingly miserable'
12 Apr 2011
*
The secret to happiness - speak to your father
18 Jun 2010
While he said happiness did return with age, he warned that older people did not actually recapture the spirit of their youth. They simply learnt to be satisfied with their lot.
"A U-shaped happiness curve does not necessarily imply that a 65 year-old prefers his own life to the life of a 25 year-old," he said. "Both the 25 year-old and 65 year-old might agree that it is nicer to be 25 than to be 65. But the 65 year-old might nevertheless be more satisfied, as he has learned to be satisfied with what he has."
Studies around the world have shown that happiness tends to dip in midlife, he said, and that this was not just a phenomenon confined to the Western world.
Last month, Lewis Wolpert, emeritus professor of biology at University College London, said happiness could peak as late as 80. In a book called You're Looking Very Well, Prof Wolpert said most people were "averagely happy" in their teens and 20s, but this declined until early middle age as they attempted to support a family and career.
He added: "From the mid-40s, people tend to become ever more cheerful and optimistic, perhaps reaching a maximum in their late 70s or 80s."
An easing of the responsibilities of middle age, maturity and an increased focus on the things we enjoy contributed to the trend, he said.
According to a study by the American National Academy of Sciences, based on a survey of 341,000 people, enjoyment of life begins an upward trend in the late 40s and does not peak until 85.
Older people today can benefit from better health and opportunities than previous generations, and research also suggests that our command of language and ability to make decisions increase with age.
Our capacity to concentrate on the parts of life and activities we enjoy, while cutting out things that we dislike, is also said to increase with age.
Meanwhile, the ageing population means an increasing number of middle-aged adults are caught between the responsibilities of raising their children and looking after their elderly parents.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8457193/Happiness-is-U-shaped-...-which-explains-why-the-middle-aged-are-grumpy.html
I'm sure this depends on many other factors instead of simply age?
2.
Happiness peaks in our eighties
We become happier when we grow older, according to scientists who claim our best years do not arrive until our late seventies and eighties.
Traditional wisdom states that our younger years are the best of our lives, with the milestone of 40 meaning we are "over the hill" and already on the wane.
But in fact satisfaction and optimism steadily increase after middle age, easily eclipsing the earlier years and peaking as late as the eighties, according to research.
An easing of the responsibilities of middle age combined with maturity and the ability to focus on the things we enjoy combine to make old age far more enjoyable than one might expect.
This is greatly increased by having good health, a stable income and good relationships with family and friends, according to scientists.
Lewis Wolpert, emeritus professor of biology at University College London, who explained the findings in a new book called You're Looking Very Well, said most people were "averagely happy" in their teens and twenties, declining until early middle age as they try to support a family and a career.
Related Articles
*
Happiness 'begins at 50'
18 May 2010
*
Victor Meldrew is a myth as elderly are happier than young, claim scientists
07 Aug 2009
He added: "But then, from the mid-forties, people tend to become ever more cheerful and optimistic, perhaps reaching a maximum in their late seventies or eighties."
A study published by the American National Academy of Sciences, based on a survey of 341,000 people, found that enjoyment of life dwindled throughout early adulthood but began an upward trend in the late forties, and continued to increase until reaching a peak at 85.
Andrew Steptoe, professor of psychology at University College London, said elderly people today benefit from better health and opportunities now than 30 years ago, adding that good health and a secure income were "very important" in old age.
Research also indicates that, while ageing can cause the weakening of some abilities such as mathematics, others such as language and decision making improve as the brain matures.
In addition, psychologists believe that in old age we become more selective with how we use our time, focusing more on doing things we enjoy and cutting out parts of life that make us unhappy.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8409411/Happiness-peaks-in-our-eighties.html
3.
Happiness begins at 50 claims new research
The good life begins at fifty claims a new report which found that this was the start of the happiest time of our lives.
Richard Alleyne
By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent 7:30AM BST 18 May 2010
Comment
Stress, anger and worry fade after the landmark birthday when we begin experiencing greater daily joy than younger adults, it is claimed.
Despite increased risk of death and disease, it seems that people worry less and that they ignore the negatives and accentuate the positives.
Dr Arthur Stone, a psychologist of Stony Brook University, New York, said the findings were "striking".
"You would think as chronic illness threatens life would get worse but that is not the case because people don't focus on the threats," he said.
"They focus on the good things in life like family and friends."
Related Articles
*
Wisdom 'is the brain slowing down in old age'
25 Jun 2010
A survey of more than 340,000 people published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found overall feelings of wellbeing improve as we pass middle age.
The researchers found positive and negative emotions varied with age similarly in both sexes – although women reported greater stress, worry and sadness at all ages.
Stress and anger reduced after people reached their early 20s with worry declining after the age of fifty.
Variables such as having young children, being unemployed, or being single did not affect age-related patterns of well being.
The research showed that levels of stress, worry and anger all dropped significantly in the fifties and levels of happiness and enjoyment increased.
The only feeling that remained constant was that of sadness. Overall feelings of well being increased in the fifties all the way up to the eighties, it was discovered.
The US participants answered yes-or-no questions regarding whether they had experienced enjoyment, happiness, stress, worry, anger and sadness during a large portion of the day prior to the call.
Researchers said the results are consistent with earlier research suggesting increased "wisdom" and emotional intelligence with age – at least through middle age.
Older people also have an increased ability to self-regulate their emotions and view their situations positively and recall fewer negative memories than younger adults.
The researchers said: "They are also in accord with a 'positivity effect' wherein older people recall fewer negative memories than younger adults and with the possibility older adults are more effective at regulating their emotions than younger adults."
Previous studies have shown increased life expectancy and widespread early retirement has created a much greater emphasis on "quality of life" among men and women in their fifties.
The consequence is instead of settling down to a stereotyped "jumpers and slippers" existence by the fireside many now pursue a vigorous social life in search of personal fulfilment.
Many more fiftysomethings see themselves as young and are adopting hedonistic attitudes as they imitate younger ways of living.
The findings back up those of a British study that showed that happiness is U-shaped over life, being at its highest in the young and old and bottoming out in middle age.
This was thought to be because people begin to accept their limitations in their later life and were just happy to be alive.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7733848/Happiness-begins-at-50-claims-new-research.html
4.
Britons becoming 'increasingly miserable', warns Action for Happiness campaign
A study of the nation's happiness has identified 10 steps to achieve a life of contentment, warning that Britons have become miserable because they are selfish, unfit, and antisocial.
Research suggests that despite having much more materially than previous generations, the country is no happier than it was half a century ago.
Experts warn that unless we undergo a “radical cultural change”, Britain will slide into unprecedented depths of despair blighted by rising rates of suicide and depression.
A group of eminent British thinkers from the worlds of education, economics and politics – backed by the Dalai Lama – yesterday launched a campaign to halt the nation’s psychological decline.
Action for Happiness, a mass movement to promote mental wellbeing, calls on people to address 10 key deficiencies in their lives to counter our growing gloom.
Led by Lord Layard, Professor of economics at the London School of Economics, it warns that we do not give enough to others, have lost the art of connecting with those around us, and no longer possess a sense of belonging in society.
Related Articles
*
How happy are you?
17 Apr 2011
*
The 10 secrets to a happy life
12 Apr 2011
*
Tackling the nation's depression is overdue
12 Apr 2011
Our happiness is also being hampered by a blinkered approach to the world around us and a lack of exercise, direction, resilience and ambition, the study claims.
Anthony Seldon, headmaster of Wellington College, who helped establish the campaign, said it is vital that better values are instilled in children at a young age to prevent unhappiness later in life.
Mr Seldon, who pioneered “wellbeing” lesson’s at the independent school in 2006, said: “Children today are like balls in a pinball machine – constantly bounced around without a solid grounding in how to behave towards other people and the values which bring wellbeing.
“Young people now are being brought up grasping for what they don’t have rather than appreciating everything they already do.
“For everything we have gained in material wealth and sophistication in recent years, we have lost in happiness and the overall richness of the fabric of society.
“If we don’t act now, in the future we are likely to see increased levels of adolescent suicide and mental illness, and a culture in which taking anti-depressant drugs is the norm.”
The movement has already gathered more than 4,500 members across 68 countries and has won the support of leading figures including the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibet; Carol Ann Duffy, the playwright; Alain de Botton, the writer; and numerous mental health charities.
Its study – based on the latest scientific research from around the world – defines trust as a “major determinant of happiness in a society”, but warns that the proportion of Britons who believe most of our peers can be trusted has fallen from 60 per cent to 30 per cent over the past half century.
Lord Layard, added: “If we want a happier society, individuals have got to create more happiness in the world around them.
“This is a movement for radical cultural change which can provide the basis for a better culture in the 21st century."
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8445786/Britons-becoming-increasingly-miserable-warns-Action-for-Happiness-campaign.html
5.
Cleaning 'could be making people depressed'
A growing obsession with cleanliness could be making people depressed, according to scientists.
Andy Bloxham
By Andy Bloxham 12:59AM BST 19 Apr 2011
Follow Andy Bloxham on Twitter
4 Comments
Researchers found that cleaner homes and offices are leaving lower levels of dirt and bacteria which could lead to weaker immune systems and, in turn, brain function being impaired.
Previous studies have linked clean homes to weak immune systems, while others have suggested a child's exposure to bacteria and things like animal hair could help develop a resistance to some illnesses.
The latest study, from Atlanta, suggested that weaker immune systems tend to over-react to dust and dirt in the form of inflammations or allergies which can slow the brain's production of "happy" chemicals such as serotonin and cause depression.
The scientists said the rates of depression are far higher in the developed world than in poorer parts of the planet.
In Britain, 10% of people claim to suffer depression, while just 1% claims the same in Nigeria, for example.
Related Articles
*
It’s a boy - and 25 minutes to curtain up
18 Apr 2011
*
Councils 'make cuts as they sit on millions'
17 Apr 2011
*
The Gulf of Mexico is not as clean as they say
15 Apr 2011
*
Leslie Phillips's wife dies of suspected overdose
13 Apr 2011
*
Britons enjoy the easy life, OECD says
13 Apr 2011
*
The council 'non-job' job adverts
10 Apr 2011
The research was conducted by exposing 27 patients to the drugs which are used to treat hepatitis C because it causes similar reactions to allergies.
Dr Andrew Miller, who was behind the research, said: "We believe the immune system is causing depression.
"As people develop and grow up, their immune system develops.
"If they are exposed to more bacteria and parasites, they are able to better control the inflammation.
"Nowadays, people's environment is much cleaner and hygienic so our immune system never really learns how to deal with infectious agents."
The research was published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8459998/Cleaning-could-be-making-people-depressed.html
The extra credit exam will be uploaded to the Kookmin website this weekend. It is due next time we meet. Print a copy of your answers and bring it to class, after mid-term week.
--------
VARIOUS NEWS ABOUT MEASURING HAPPINESS
1. Mark Whitaker
2. The Age Curve of Aggregate Subjective Happiness?
Another variable to integrate into happiness models when testing for subjective happiness is mentioned below in some recent research. Thus observations of subjective happiness subjectively should be weighted by age or studies should at least test three different 'regions' of age to see if it holds true in all societies or see if this observation changes over time, or different 'regions' of happiness and 'grumpyness' move around over time in their boundaries.
---------------
Happiness is U-shaped ... which explains why the middle-aged are grumpy
Happiness follows a U-shaped curve during a person's lifetime, according to research showing that middle-aged people are the unhappiest.
Stephen Adams
By Stephen Adams 11:30PM BST 17 Apr 2011
39 Comments
Satisfaction with life starts to drop as early as a person's late 20s and does not begin to recover until well past 50, says Bert van Landeghem, an economist at Maastricht University in Belgium.
While young adults are carefree and full of hope for the future and the over-50s have come to terms with the trials of life, the research indicates that those in the middle feel weighed down by the demands on them.
The study found "a substantial dip in happiness during the middle of people's lives is the equivalent to becoming unemployed or losing a family member".
The conclusions come in a study of how people perceive their wellbeing.
Mr van Landeghem, who is 29, will present his research at the Royal Economic Society annual conference at Royal Holloway, the University of London, this week.
Related Articles
*
Happiness peaks in our eighties
28 Mar 2011
*
Britons 'increasingly miserable'
12 Apr 2011
*
The secret to happiness - speak to your father
18 Jun 2010
While he said happiness did return with age, he warned that older people did not actually recapture the spirit of their youth. They simply learnt to be satisfied with their lot.
"A U-shaped happiness curve does not necessarily imply that a 65 year-old prefers his own life to the life of a 25 year-old," he said. "Both the 25 year-old and 65 year-old might agree that it is nicer to be 25 than to be 65. But the 65 year-old might nevertheless be more satisfied, as he has learned to be satisfied with what he has."
Studies around the world have shown that happiness tends to dip in midlife, he said, and that this was not just a phenomenon confined to the Western world.
Last month, Lewis Wolpert, emeritus professor of biology at University College London, said happiness could peak as late as 80. In a book called You're Looking Very Well, Prof Wolpert said most people were "averagely happy" in their teens and 20s, but this declined until early middle age as they attempted to support a family and career.
He added: "From the mid-40s, people tend to become ever more cheerful and optimistic, perhaps reaching a maximum in their late 70s or 80s."
An easing of the responsibilities of middle age, maturity and an increased focus on the things we enjoy contributed to the trend, he said.
According to a study by the American National Academy of Sciences, based on a survey of 341,000 people, enjoyment of life begins an upward trend in the late 40s and does not peak until 85.
Older people today can benefit from better health and opportunities than previous generations, and research also suggests that our command of language and ability to make decisions increase with age.
Our capacity to concentrate on the parts of life and activities we enjoy, while cutting out things that we dislike, is also said to increase with age.
Meanwhile, the ageing population means an increasing number of middle-aged adults are caught between the responsibilities of raising their children and looking after their elderly parents.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/8457193/Happiness-is-U-shaped-...-which-explains-why-the-middle-aged-are-grumpy.html
I'm sure this depends on many other factors instead of simply age?
2.
Happiness peaks in our eighties
We become happier when we grow older, according to scientists who claim our best years do not arrive until our late seventies and eighties.
Traditional wisdom states that our younger years are the best of our lives, with the milestone of 40 meaning we are "over the hill" and already on the wane.
But in fact satisfaction and optimism steadily increase after middle age, easily eclipsing the earlier years and peaking as late as the eighties, according to research.
An easing of the responsibilities of middle age combined with maturity and the ability to focus on the things we enjoy combine to make old age far more enjoyable than one might expect.
This is greatly increased by having good health, a stable income and good relationships with family and friends, according to scientists.
Lewis Wolpert, emeritus professor of biology at University College London, who explained the findings in a new book called You're Looking Very Well, said most people were "averagely happy" in their teens and twenties, declining until early middle age as they try to support a family and a career.
Related Articles
*
Happiness 'begins at 50'
18 May 2010
*
Victor Meldrew is a myth as elderly are happier than young, claim scientists
07 Aug 2009
He added: "But then, from the mid-forties, people tend to become ever more cheerful and optimistic, perhaps reaching a maximum in their late seventies or eighties."
A study published by the American National Academy of Sciences, based on a survey of 341,000 people, found that enjoyment of life dwindled throughout early adulthood but began an upward trend in the late forties, and continued to increase until reaching a peak at 85.
Andrew Steptoe, professor of psychology at University College London, said elderly people today benefit from better health and opportunities now than 30 years ago, adding that good health and a secure income were "very important" in old age.
Research also indicates that, while ageing can cause the weakening of some abilities such as mathematics, others such as language and decision making improve as the brain matures.
In addition, psychologists believe that in old age we become more selective with how we use our time, focusing more on doing things we enjoy and cutting out parts of life that make us unhappy.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8409411/Happiness-peaks-in-our-eighties.html
3.
Happiness begins at 50 claims new research
The good life begins at fifty claims a new report which found that this was the start of the happiest time of our lives.
Richard Alleyne
By Richard Alleyne, Science Correspondent 7:30AM BST 18 May 2010
Comment
Stress, anger and worry fade after the landmark birthday when we begin experiencing greater daily joy than younger adults, it is claimed.
Despite increased risk of death and disease, it seems that people worry less and that they ignore the negatives and accentuate the positives.
Dr Arthur Stone, a psychologist of Stony Brook University, New York, said the findings were "striking".
"You would think as chronic illness threatens life would get worse but that is not the case because people don't focus on the threats," he said.
"They focus on the good things in life like family and friends."
Related Articles
*
Wisdom 'is the brain slowing down in old age'
25 Jun 2010
A survey of more than 340,000 people published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found overall feelings of wellbeing improve as we pass middle age.
The researchers found positive and negative emotions varied with age similarly in both sexes – although women reported greater stress, worry and sadness at all ages.
Stress and anger reduced after people reached their early 20s with worry declining after the age of fifty.
Variables such as having young children, being unemployed, or being single did not affect age-related patterns of well being.
The research showed that levels of stress, worry and anger all dropped significantly in the fifties and levels of happiness and enjoyment increased.
The only feeling that remained constant was that of sadness. Overall feelings of well being increased in the fifties all the way up to the eighties, it was discovered.
The US participants answered yes-or-no questions regarding whether they had experienced enjoyment, happiness, stress, worry, anger and sadness during a large portion of the day prior to the call.
Researchers said the results are consistent with earlier research suggesting increased "wisdom" and emotional intelligence with age – at least through middle age.
Older people also have an increased ability to self-regulate their emotions and view their situations positively and recall fewer negative memories than younger adults.
The researchers said: "They are also in accord with a 'positivity effect' wherein older people recall fewer negative memories than younger adults and with the possibility older adults are more effective at regulating their emotions than younger adults."
Previous studies have shown increased life expectancy and widespread early retirement has created a much greater emphasis on "quality of life" among men and women in their fifties.
The consequence is instead of settling down to a stereotyped "jumpers and slippers" existence by the fireside many now pursue a vigorous social life in search of personal fulfilment.
Many more fiftysomethings see themselves as young and are adopting hedonistic attitudes as they imitate younger ways of living.
The findings back up those of a British study that showed that happiness is U-shaped over life, being at its highest in the young and old and bottoming out in middle age.
This was thought to be because people begin to accept their limitations in their later life and were just happy to be alive.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/7733848/Happiness-begins-at-50-claims-new-research.html
4.
Britons becoming 'increasingly miserable', warns Action for Happiness campaign
A study of the nation's happiness has identified 10 steps to achieve a life of contentment, warning that Britons have become miserable because they are selfish, unfit, and antisocial.
Research suggests that despite having much more materially than previous generations, the country is no happier than it was half a century ago.
Experts warn that unless we undergo a “radical cultural change”, Britain will slide into unprecedented depths of despair blighted by rising rates of suicide and depression.
A group of eminent British thinkers from the worlds of education, economics and politics – backed by the Dalai Lama – yesterday launched a campaign to halt the nation’s psychological decline.
Action for Happiness, a mass movement to promote mental wellbeing, calls on people to address 10 key deficiencies in their lives to counter our growing gloom.
Led by Lord Layard, Professor of economics at the London School of Economics, it warns that we do not give enough to others, have lost the art of connecting with those around us, and no longer possess a sense of belonging in society.
Related Articles
*
How happy are you?
17 Apr 2011
*
The 10 secrets to a happy life
12 Apr 2011
*
Tackling the nation's depression is overdue
12 Apr 2011
Our happiness is also being hampered by a blinkered approach to the world around us and a lack of exercise, direction, resilience and ambition, the study claims.
Anthony Seldon, headmaster of Wellington College, who helped establish the campaign, said it is vital that better values are instilled in children at a young age to prevent unhappiness later in life.
Mr Seldon, who pioneered “wellbeing” lesson’s at the independent school in 2006, said: “Children today are like balls in a pinball machine – constantly bounced around without a solid grounding in how to behave towards other people and the values which bring wellbeing.
“Young people now are being brought up grasping for what they don’t have rather than appreciating everything they already do.
“For everything we have gained in material wealth and sophistication in recent years, we have lost in happiness and the overall richness of the fabric of society.
“If we don’t act now, in the future we are likely to see increased levels of adolescent suicide and mental illness, and a culture in which taking anti-depressant drugs is the norm.”
The movement has already gathered more than 4,500 members across 68 countries and has won the support of leading figures including the Dalai Lama, the spiritual leader of Tibet; Carol Ann Duffy, the playwright; Alain de Botton, the writer; and numerous mental health charities.
Its study – based on the latest scientific research from around the world – defines trust as a “major determinant of happiness in a society”, but warns that the proportion of Britons who believe most of our peers can be trusted has fallen from 60 per cent to 30 per cent over the past half century.
Lord Layard, added: “If we want a happier society, individuals have got to create more happiness in the world around them.
“This is a movement for radical cultural change which can provide the basis for a better culture in the 21st century."
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8445786/Britons-becoming-increasingly-miserable-warns-Action-for-Happiness-campaign.html
5.
Cleaning 'could be making people depressed'
A growing obsession with cleanliness could be making people depressed, according to scientists.
Andy Bloxham
By Andy Bloxham 12:59AM BST 19 Apr 2011
Follow Andy Bloxham on Twitter
4 Comments
Researchers found that cleaner homes and offices are leaving lower levels of dirt and bacteria which could lead to weaker immune systems and, in turn, brain function being impaired.
Previous studies have linked clean homes to weak immune systems, while others have suggested a child's exposure to bacteria and things like animal hair could help develop a resistance to some illnesses.
The latest study, from Atlanta, suggested that weaker immune systems tend to over-react to dust and dirt in the form of inflammations or allergies which can slow the brain's production of "happy" chemicals such as serotonin and cause depression.
The scientists said the rates of depression are far higher in the developed world than in poorer parts of the planet.
In Britain, 10% of people claim to suffer depression, while just 1% claims the same in Nigeria, for example.
Related Articles
*
It’s a boy - and 25 minutes to curtain up
18 Apr 2011
*
Councils 'make cuts as they sit on millions'
17 Apr 2011
*
The Gulf of Mexico is not as clean as they say
15 Apr 2011
*
Leslie Phillips's wife dies of suspected overdose
13 Apr 2011
*
Britons enjoy the easy life, OECD says
13 Apr 2011
*
The council 'non-job' job adverts
10 Apr 2011
The research was conducted by exposing 27 patients to the drugs which are used to treat hepatitis C because it causes similar reactions to allergies.
Dr Andrew Miller, who was behind the research, said: "We believe the immune system is causing depression.
"As people develop and grow up, their immune system develops.
"If they are exposed to more bacteria and parasites, they are able to better control the inflammation.
"Nowadays, people's environment is much cleaner and hygienic so our immune system never really learns how to deal with infectious agents."
The research was published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.
---
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8459998/Cleaning-could-be-making-people-depressed.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)